• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介入放射科医生经右颈内静脉置入带隧道血液透析导管的结果。

Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists.

作者信息

Trerotola S O, Johnson M S, Harris V J, Shah H, Ambrosius W T, McKusky M A, Kraus M A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202-5253, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):489-95. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114110.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114110
PMID:9114110
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of interventional radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters via the right internal jugular vein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 194 patients, the catheter was placed via the right internal jugular vein unless thrombosis was present. Real-time ultrasound-guided puncture and fluoroscopic guidance were used. Patients were followed up until catheter removal or death. Outcomes evaluated included infection, thrombosis, and catheter malfunction.

RESULTS

In 175 patients, 250 consecutive catheters were placed via the right internal jugular vein with 100% success. All catheters functioned immediately after placement. Procedural complications were limited to clinically unimportant air embolus (n = 2). No instances of pneumothorax, hemothorax, or substantial bleeding complications occurred. Follow-up was available in 173 (99%) patients. Mean and median "catheter duration" were 87 and 56 days, respectively. Catheter-related symptomatic venous thrombosis or stenosis was not observed. The rate of infection was 0.08 per 100 catheter days, and the rate of malfunction that necessitated removal was 0.22 per 100 catheter days. Definite or possible catheter thrombosis that necessitated removal occurred at a rate of 0.16 per 100 catheter days.

CONCLUSION

Interventional radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters via the right internal jugular vein showed equal or better long-term results than those reported for surgical placement. Interventional radiologic placement should be the method of choice.

摘要

目的

评估经右颈内静脉置入带隧道的血液透析导管的介入放射学操作结果。

材料与方法

194例患者中,除非存在血栓形成,否则均经右颈内静脉置入导管。采用实时超声引导穿刺和荧光透视引导。对患者进行随访直至导管拔除或死亡。评估的结果包括感染、血栓形成和导管功能障碍。

结果

175例患者经右颈内静脉连续置入250根导管,成功率达100%。所有导管置入后立即发挥功能。操作并发症仅限于临床上无重要意义的空气栓塞(n = 2)。未发生气胸、血胸或严重出血并发症。173例(99%)患者获得随访。平均和中位“导管使用时间”分别为87天和56天。未观察到与导管相关的有症状静脉血栓形成或狭窄。感染发生率为每100导管日0.08例,因功能障碍而必须拔除的发生率为每100导管日0.22例。因明确或可能的导管血栓形成而必须拔除的发生率为每100导管日0.16例。

结论

经右颈内静脉进行介入放射学置入带隧道的血液透析导管,其长期结果与手术置入报道的结果相当或更佳。介入放射学置入应作为首选方法。

相似文献

1
Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists.介入放射科医生经右颈内静脉置入带隧道血液透析导管的结果。
Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):489-95. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114110.
2
Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.成年患者的带隧道式颈内静脉导管:血液透析导管与输液导管的结局比较
Acta Radiol. 2007 Jul;48(6):613-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850701342104.
3
Mediastinal approach to the placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with central vein occlusion in an outpatient access center.在门诊血管通路中心,针对中心静脉闭塞患者采用纵隔入路放置带隧道的血液透析导管。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Jul-Sep;12(3):258-61. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2010.6084.
4
Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists.放射科医生放置的带隧道血液透析导管的结果。
Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):467-72. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596851.
5
Outcome of radiologically placed tunneled haemodialysis catheters.经放射学放置的带隧道血液透析导管的结局
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Dec;23(12):837-41.
6
Internal jugular vein thrombosis associated with hemodialysis catheters.与血液透析导管相关的颈内静脉血栓形成
Radiology. 2003 Sep;228(3):697-700. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2283020681. Epub 2003 Jul 24.
7
Radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in occluded neck, chest, or small thyrocervical collateral veins in central venous occlusion.在中心静脉闭塞时,将隧道式血液透析导管放射学放置于闭塞的颈部、胸部或甲状腺颈侧小静脉中。
Radiology. 2001 Feb;218(2):471-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe29471.
8
Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: use of a silver-coated catheter for prevention of infection--a randomized study.带隧道的血液透析导管:使用银涂层导管预防感染——一项随机研究。
Radiology. 1998 May;207(2):491-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577500.
9
Do AshSplit haemodialysis catheters provide better flow rates in the long term?AshSplit血液透析导管长期来看能提供更好的血流量吗?
Ren Fail. 2007;29(6):721-9. doi: 10.1080/08860220701460137.
10
[Tesio twin catheter system for hemodialysis tunnelized using an echo-guided technique. Retrospective analysis of 210 catheters].[采用超声引导技术置入的用于血液透析的特西奥双腔导管系统。对210根导管的回顾性分析]
Nefrologia. 2006;26(6):719-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to Prevent Hemodialysis Catheter Dysfunction.预防血液透析导管功能障碍的策略。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 May 1;36(5):952-966. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000666. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Long-Term Durability of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters: Outcomes from a Single Institution 22-Year Experience.隧道式血液透析导管的长期耐用性:来自单一机构22年经验的结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 May;48(5):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03941-4. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Variables Leading to Usage of Alteplase Versus Heparin Lock in Patients With Tunneled Catheters in Hemodialysis Care Project Centers, Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯血液透析护理项目中心带隧道导管患者使用阿替普酶与肝素封管的相关变量
Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60817. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60817. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.巴西血管病学和血管外科学会血液透析血管通路指南。
J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230052. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300522. eCollection 2023.
5
Outcome of Cuffed Tunneled Dialysis Catheters for Hemodialysis Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.三级保健医院血液透析患者带袖口隧道透析导管的结果:描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Jun 30;58(226):390-395. doi: 10.31729/jnma.4795.
6
Effectiveness and Cost of Weekly Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Hemodialysis Catheter Locking Solution.每周使用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂行血液透析导管封管的效果和成本。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):429-435. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08510817. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
7
Interventions for treating central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction.治疗中心静脉血液透析导管故障的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 26;10(10):CD011953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011953.pub2.
8
Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis.中心静脉端口导管中的纤维蛋白鞘:门诊低剂量单次注射尿激酶治疗
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jan 24;13:111-115. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S125130. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of cost-effectiveness from the funding body's point of view of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion compared with the conventional technique.从资助机构的角度评估超声引导下中心静脉导管插入术与传统技术相比的成本效益。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Jan-Mar;28(1):62-9. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160014.
10
Comparison of treatment delay associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement between interventionists.介入医生之间与隧道式血液透析导管置入相关的治疗延迟比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):543-51. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.377. Epub 2016 Apr 14.