• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄勒冈州精神健康治疗预立医嘱使用情况调查。

A survey on use of advance directives for mental health treatment in Oregon.

作者信息

Backlar P, McFarland B H

机构信息

Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Dec;47(12):1387-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.12.1387.

DOI:10.1176/ps.47.12.1387
PMID:9117481
Abstract

Oregon is one of three states that allows persons to prepare a legal document-and advance directive-to stipulate the mental health treatment they wish to receive should they lose their decision-making capacity. An informal one-page questionnaire on the use of advance directives for mental health treatment in the state was enclosed in newsletters sent to families and care providers of persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Responses were received from 156 people; they reported that 64 advance directives had been completed by consumers, 40 surrogate decision makers had been appointed, and ten consumers had used their advance directives when in crisis. In each case, the consumer's wishes were honored. The small response to this preliminary survey suggests the need for further education about advance directives among mental health care consumers, their families, and providers.

摘要

俄勒冈州是允许人们准备一份法律文件——预先指示——以规定如果失去决策能力时希望接受的心理健康治疗的三个州之一。一份关于该州心理健康治疗预先指示使用情况的非正式单页调查问卷随附在发送给严重和持续性精神障碍患者家庭及护理人员的时事通讯中。收到了156人的回复;他们报告说,消费者已完成64份预先指示,已指定40名替代决策者,10名消费者在危机时使用了他们的预先指示。在每种情况下,消费者的意愿都得到了尊重。对这项初步调查的少量回复表明,需要在心理健康护理消费者、他们的家人和提供者中进一步开展关于预先指示的教育。

相似文献

1
A survey on use of advance directives for mental health treatment in Oregon.俄勒冈州精神健康治疗预立医嘱使用情况调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Dec;47(12):1387-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.12.1387.
2
[Advanced directives in psychiatry: A review of the qualitative literature, a state-of-the-art and viewpoints].[精神病学中的预立医疗指示:定性文献综述、最新进展与观点]
Encephale. 2013 Sep;39(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.012. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Advance directives for mental health treatment.精神卫生治疗的预先指示。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jul;50(7):919-25. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.919.
4
Advance directives for mental health care: an analysis of state statutes.精神卫生保健预先指示:州法规分析
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):788-804.
5
Advance directives for psychiatric care: a theoretical and practical overview for legal professionals.精神科护理预先指示:给法律专业人士的理论与实践概述
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):746-87.
6
Psychiatric Advance Directives in India: What will the future hold?印度的精神科预嘱:未来将如何?
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Aug;16:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
7
The Nexum: a modest proposal for self-guardianship by contract: a system of advance directives and surrogate committees-at-large for the intermittently mentally ill.《债务抵押契约》:一份关于通过契约实现自我监护的适度提议:为间歇性精神病患者设立预先指示和代理委员会的制度。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1999 Winter;16(1):1-95.
8
Ulysses in Minnesota: first steps toward a self-binding psychiatric advance directive statute.明尼苏达州的尤利西斯:迈向具有自我约束力的精神科预先指示法规的第一步。
Cornell Law Rev. 1993 Sep;78(6):1152-86.
9
Implementing psychiatric advance directives: service provider issues and answers.实施精神科预先指示:服务提供者的问题与解答
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;30(3):253-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02287316.
10
The longing for order: Oregon's medical advance directive for mental health treatment.
Community Ment Health J. 1995 Apr;31(2):103-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02188759.

引用本文的文献

1
User-held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness.用于严重精神疾病患者常规护理的个人持有信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 5;2013(10):CD001711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001711.pub2.
2
Psychiatric advance directives and social workers: an integrative review.精神科预嘱与社会工作者:一项综合回顾。
Soc Work. 2010 Apr;55(2):157-67. doi: 10.1093/sw/55.2.157.
3
Psychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis interventions.精神科预先指示与减少强制性危机干预
J Ment Health. 2008 Jan 1;17(3):255-267. doi: 10.1080/09638230802052195.
4
Competence to complete psychiatric advance directives: effects of facilitated decision making.完成精神科预先指示的能力:辅助决策的效果。
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Jun;31(3):275-89. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9064-6.
5
Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship.社区强制权力的可接受性:心理健康服务使用者对监督出院和监护的伦理考量。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):457-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.004861.
6
Implementing psychiatric advance directives: service provider issues and answers.实施精神科预先指示:服务提供者的问题与解答
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;30(3):253-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02287316.
7
The use of advance directives by persons with serious mental illness for psychiatric treatment.
Psychiatr Q. 2000 Spring;71(1):1-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1004660915824.
8
Computer-assisted creation of psychiatric advance directives.
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Aug;34(4):351-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1018731922671.
9
Advance directives for subjects of research who have fluctuating cognitive impairments due to psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia).针对因精神疾病(如精神分裂症)导致认知功能波动受损的研究对象的预先指示。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Jun;34(3):229-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1018709606374.