Suppr超能文献

监测早产儿自主呼吸与机械通气之间的相互作用。

Monitoring interactions between spontaneous respiration and mechanical inflations in preterm neonates.

作者信息

Bignall S, Dixon P, Quinn C, Kitney R

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College of Medicine at St. Mary's, London, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):545-53. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00027.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of a new bedside monitor in assessing the interactions between spontaneous respiratory activity and ventilator inflations in preterm infants; and to monitor continuously the degree of patient-ventilator synchrony and the stability of spontaneous respiratory effort during different modes of ventilation and in response to care procedures.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study of physiologic variables recorded by a computerized monitoring system.

SETTING

A neonatal intensive care unit in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one neonates (median gestational age of 28 wks [range 24 to 36]; median birth weight of 942 g [range 624 to 2940]) were monitored during conventional mandatory ventilation at rates ranging from 47 to 108 inflations/min, and 22 infants (median gestational age of 27.5 wks [range 25 to 40]; median birth weight of 1345 g [range 510 to 3490]) were monitored during patient-triggered ventilation. All infants were sedated as part of the routine care policy.

INTERVENTIONS

Spontaneous respiration (abdominal pressure capsule) and ventilator inflations (airway pressure) were recorded continuously for periods of up to 3 days in mechanically ventilated preterm infants.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The monitoring system uses the Frequency Tracking Locus method to derive the interaction Score, which quantifies the degree of entrainment of the spontaneous respiratory pattern by the ventilator. This analysis was applied to airway pressure and abdominal capsule signals. A perfect 1:1 interaction between spontaneous inspirations and mechanical inflations returns an interaction Score of 1.00, and irregular interactions return a score of > 1.5. During conventional mandatory ventilation, a total of 53,074 16-sec epochs (representing 782,811 spontaneous breaths) were studied in 31 preterm infants: 27.4% of epochs showed a 1:1 interaction, 60.5% a non 1:1 interaction, and 12.1% indicated a passive (i.e., infant apneic) response by the infant, despite excluding periods when paralyzing agents were used. The median interaction Score value during 1:1 interactions was 1.2, whereas for non 1:1 interactions the interaction Score was 2.2. One to one entrainment occurred at conventional mandatory ventilation rates between 50 and 85 inflations/min: for many infants, such entrainment was achievable over a range of conventional mandatory ventilation rates, while in some infants respiration was unstable at all rates of conventional mandatory ventilation. During passive ventilation, the median Interaction Score was 1.0. During patient-triggered mechanical ventilation, approximately 67,150 spontaneous respiratory cycles, represented by 3,592 16-sec epochs, were studied in 22 infants. Overall, 19.5% (702) of epochs showed the criteria for ideal triggering by spontaneous inspiration and 19.6% (703) showed autotriggering. In 60.9% (2187) of epochs, a non 1:1 interaction was noted. During ideal patient-triggered mechanical ventilation, the median interaction Score was 1.14; during passive (autotriggered) ventilation, the median Interaction Score was 1.05; and during non 1:1 ventilation, the median score was 1.74. "Autotriggering" was found frequently in infants of < or = 28 wks gestation. The monitor was able to distinguish between stable and unstable interactions and apnea during conventional mandatory ventilation and patient-triggered mechanical ventilation by reference to the Interaction Score value.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a new kind of bedside monitor for the Interpretation of respiratory data. Unlike other methods, it is able to give the clinician a continuous measure of patient-ventilator interaction which is easy to interpret. It appears to have wide-spread application in neonatal intensive care nurseries where the babies' own breathing efforts can affect the efficiency of respiration and cause unwanted physiologic instability. The monitor can be used to determine the optimal ventilatory settings to

摘要

目的

确定一种新型床边监测仪在评估早产儿自主呼吸活动与呼吸机通气之间相互作用的价值;并在不同通气模式下以及对护理操作的反应过程中,持续监测患者与呼吸机的同步程度以及自主呼吸努力的稳定性。

设计

一项对计算机监测系统记录的生理变量进行的前瞻性观察研究。

地点

一家教学医院的新生儿重症监护病房。

患者

31例新生儿(中位胎龄28周[范围24至36周];中位出生体重942克[范围624至2940克])在常规强制通气期间接受监测,通气频率为47至108次/分钟,22例婴儿(中位胎龄27.5周[范围25至40周];中位出生体重1345克[范围510至3490克])在患者触发通气期间接受监测。作为常规护理策略的一部分,所有婴儿均接受了镇静。

干预措施

对机械通气的早产儿连续记录长达3天的自主呼吸(腹压胶囊)和呼吸机通气(气道压力)。

测量和主要结果

监测系统使用频率跟踪轨迹法得出相互作用评分,该评分量化了呼吸机对自主呼吸模式的同步程度。该分析应用于气道压力和腹压胶囊信号。自主吸气与机械通气之间完美的1:1相互作用产生的相互作用评分为1.00,不规则相互作用产生的评分为>1.5。在常规强制通气期间,对31例早产儿的53,074个16秒时段(代表782,811次自主呼吸)进行了研究:27.4%的时段显示为1:1相互作用,60.5%为非1:1相互作用,12.1%表明婴儿有被动(即婴儿呼吸暂停)反应,尽管排除了使用麻痹剂的时段。1:1相互作用期间的中位相互作用评分值为1.2,而非1:1相互作用期间的相互作用评分为2.2。在50至85次/分钟的常规强制通气频率下发生1:1同步:对于许多婴儿来说,在一系列常规强制通气频率下都能实现这种同步,而在一些婴儿中,在所有常规强制通气频率下呼吸都不稳定。在被动通气期间,中位相互作用评分为1.0。在患者触发的机械通气期间,对22例婴儿的3,592个16秒时段所代表的约67,150个自主呼吸周期进行了研究。总体而言,19.5%(702个)的时段显示出由自主吸气实现理想触发的标准,19.6%(703个)显示出自动触发。在60.9%(2187个)的时段中,观察到非1:1相互作用。在理想的患者触发机械通气期间,中位相互作用评分为1.14;在被动(自动触发)通气期间,中位相互作用评分为1.05;在非1:1通气期间,中位评分为1.74。“自动触发”在胎龄≤28周的婴儿中经常出现。该监测仪能够通过参考相互作用评分值在常规强制通气和患者触发的机械通气期间区分稳定和不稳定的相互作用以及呼吸暂停。

结论

我们描述了一种用于解读呼吸数据的新型床边监测仪。与其他方法不同,它能够为临床医生提供一种易于解读的患者与呼吸机相互作用的连续测量值。它似乎在新生儿重症监护病房有广泛应用,在这些病房中,婴儿自身的呼吸努力会影响呼吸效率并导致不必要的生理不稳定。该监测仪可用于确定最佳通气设置以

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验