Baumer J H
Department of Paediatrics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8DH.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Jan;82(1):F5-F10. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.1.f5.
To compare the effects of patient triggered ventilation (PTV) with conventional ventilation (IMV) in preterm infants ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
Nine hundred and twenty four babies from 22 neonatal intensive care units were assessed. They were under 32 weeks of gestation and had been ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for less than 6 hours within 72 hours of birth. The infants were randomly allocated to receive either PTV or IMV. Analysis was on an "intention to treat" basis. Death before discharge home or oxygen therapy at 36 weeks of gestation; pneumothorax while ventilated; cerebral ultrasound abnormality nearest to 6 weeks; and duration of ventilation in survivors were the main outcome measures.
There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. Unadjusted rates for death or oxygen dependency at 36 weeks of gestation were 47.4% and 48.7%, for PTV and IMV, respectively; for pneumothorax these were 13.4% and 10.3%; and for cerebral ultrasound abnormality nearest to 6 weeks these were 35.4% and 36.9%. Median duration of ventilation for survivors in both groups was 6 days. Overall, 79% of babies received only their assigned ventilation. PTV babies were more likely to depart from their intended ventilation (27% vs 15%). The trend towards higher pneumothorax rates with PTV occurred only in infants below 28 weeks of gestation (18.8% vs 11.8%).
There was no observed benefit from the use of PTV, with a trend towards a higher rate of pneumothorax under 28 weeks of gestation. Although PTV has a similar outcome to IMV for treatment of RDS in infants of 28 weeks or more gestation, within 72 hours of birth, it was abandoned more often. It cannot be recommended for infants of less than 28 weeks' gestation with the ventilators used in this study.
比较患者触发通气(PTV)与传统通气(IMV)对因呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)接受通气治疗的早产儿的影响。
对来自22个新生儿重症监护病房的924名婴儿进行评估。这些婴儿孕周小于32周,在出生后72小时内因呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)接受通气治疗不足6小时。将婴儿随机分配接受PTV或IMV。分析基于“意向性治疗”原则。出院前死亡或孕36周时需氧疗情况;通气时发生气胸情况;最接近6周时脑超声异常情况;以及存活者的通气时长为主要观察指标。
两组间观察指标无显著差异。孕36周时未经调整的死亡或氧依赖发生率,PTV组和IMV组分别为47.4%和48.7%;气胸发生率分别为13.4%和10.3%;最接近6周时脑超声异常发生率分别为35.4%和36.9%。两组存活者的通气时长中位数均为6天。总体而言,79%的婴儿仅接受了分配的通气方式。接受PTV的婴儿更有可能偏离其预定通气方式(27%对15%)。PTV组气胸发生率较高的趋势仅出现在孕周小于28周的婴儿中(18.8%对11.8%)。
未观察到使用PTV有任何益处,且在孕周小于28周时有气胸发生率升高的趋势。尽管在出生72小时内,对于孕周28周及以上的婴儿,PTV治疗RDS的效果与IMV相似,但PTV被更频繁地弃用。对于本研究中使用的呼吸机,不推荐用于孕周小于28周的婴儿。