Suppr超能文献

C1-2后路融合术与椎动脉减压术治疗弓猎型卒中的比较

Comparison of C1-2 posterior fusion and decompression of the vertebral artery in the treatment of bow hunter's stroke.

作者信息

Matsuyama T, Morimoto T, Sakaki T

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1997 Apr;86(4):619-23. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.4.0619.

Abstract

Bow hunter's stroke results from vertebrobasilar insufficiency caused by mechanical occlusion or stenosis of the vertebral artery (VA) at the C1-2 level on head rotation. Surgical treatment of this condition may be chosen to avoid life-threatening accidents or because patients complain that conservative treatments such as verbal warnings or use of a neck brace to limit head and neck rotation are ineffective and thus restrict their lifestyle. Posterior fusion involving C1-2 has long been used to limit atlantoaxial rotational movements. However, it has the serious disadvantage that the range of head motion is severely reduced. Recently, decompression of the atlantoaxial portions of the affected VA has been used because it does not limit physiological neck movements. However, no long-term follow-up review of patients who have undergone this procedure has been conducted, and it is unclear whether this procedure always provides relief of symptoms. To answer this question, the results of C1-2 posterior fusion were compared with decompression of the VA for the treatment of bow hunter's stroke.

摘要

弓猎者卒中是由于头部旋转时C1-2水平椎动脉(VA)机械性闭塞或狭窄导致椎基底动脉供血不足引起的。对于这种情况,可选择手术治疗以避免危及生命的事故,或者因为患者抱怨诸如口头警告或使用颈托限制头颈部旋转等保守治疗无效,从而限制了他们的生活方式。涉及C1-2的后路融合术长期以来一直用于限制寰枢椎旋转运动。然而,它有一个严重的缺点,即头部运动范围会严重减小。最近,对受影响的VA的寰枢椎部分进行减压被采用,因为它不会限制颈部的生理运动。然而,尚未对接受该手术的患者进行长期随访复查,并且尚不清楚该手术是否总能缓解症状。为了回答这个问题,将C1-2后路融合术与VA减压术治疗弓猎者卒中的结果进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验