Prause G, Ratzenhofer-Comenda B, Pierer G, Smolle-Jüttner F, Glanzer H, Smolle J
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Graz, Austria.
Anaesthesia. 1997 Mar;52(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.074-az0074.x.
This trial was designed to study the correlation between peri-operative mortality in patients undergoing elective surgery and the physical status classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the Goldman multifactorial cardiac risk index or the two indices combined. All patients scheduled for elective surgery over a 5-year period were evaluated pre-operatively and were scored according to both indices. Of 16,227 patients studied, 215 died within 4 weeks of operation. Both indices correlated significantly with peri-operative mortality, the ASA grade showing a closer correlation. A regression tree analysis divided the combination groups into five subgroups where the mortality was lowest (0.4%) in ASA grade < or = 2 and cardiac risk index group I (score 0-5 points) and increased up to 7.3% in ASA grade = 4 and cardiac risk index group > or = 3 (score > 13 points). We conclude that for this large number of patients peri-operative mortality can be predicted with the ASA grade and, to a lesser degree, with the cardiac risk index. Applied in the correct way, the combination of the two scores can increase the accuracy of prediction of peri-operative mortality.
本试验旨在研究择期手术患者围手术期死亡率与美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类、戈德曼多因素心脏风险指数或两者联合指数之间的相关性。对5年内计划进行择期手术的所有患者进行术前评估,并根据这两个指数进行评分。在研究的16227例患者中,215例在术后4周内死亡。两个指数均与围手术期死亡率显著相关,美国麻醉医师协会分级显示出更密切的相关性。回归树分析将联合分组分为五个亚组,其中美国麻醉医师协会分级≤2级且心脏风险指数I组(评分0 - 5分)的死亡率最低(0.4%),而美国麻醉医师协会分级 = 4级且心脏风险指数≥3组(评分>13分)的死亡率高达7.3%。我们得出结论,对于大量此类患者,围手术期死亡率可以用美国麻醉医师协会分级预测,在较小程度上也可用心脏风险指数预测。以正确方式应用时,两个评分的联合可提高围手术期死亡率预测的准确性。