Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I
UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Apr 15;145(8):762-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/145.8.762.
The agreement between self-reported diseases in a questionnaire survey and data from medical records was assessed in a representative sample of Finnish men and women (n = 596) aged 45-73 years. The accumulated medical record information was abstracted from the records in the health centers and the central hospital in the study region. The agreement between the two information sources was substantial (kappa 0.73-0.80) for cardiovascular diseases as a group, hypertension, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and diabetes. The lowest agreement (kappa < 0.55) was found for lower back disorder, hip and knee arthrosis, and claudication. These results showed that the agreement between questionnaire data and medical records was good for well-known chronic diseases that have clear diagnostic criteria and are easily communicated to the patient. Conversely, the agreement was poor for diseases with nonestablished diagnostic criteria and a fluctuating course.
在芬兰45至73岁的男性和女性代表性样本(n = 596)中,评估了问卷调查中自我报告的疾病与病历数据之间的一致性。累积的病历信息是从研究区域的健康中心和中心医院的病历中提取的。对于心血管疾病总体、高血压、心绞痛、心肌梗死和糖尿病,这两种信息来源之间的一致性较高(kappa值为0.73 - 0.80)。对于下背部疾病、髋部和膝部关节炎以及跛行,一致性最低(kappa < 0.55)。这些结果表明,对于具有明确诊断标准且易于告知患者的知名慢性病,问卷调查数据与病历之间的一致性良好。相反,对于诊断标准不明确且病程波动的疾病,一致性较差。