Suppr超能文献

通过联系全科医生验证儿童癌症幸存者自述的心血管问题:可行性和结果。

Validation of self-reported cardiovascular problems in childhood cancer survivors by contacting general practitioners: feasibility and results.

机构信息

Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2024 Mar 8;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02322-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies often rely on self-reported health problems and validation greatly improves study quality. In a study of late effects after childhood cancer, we validated self-reported cardiovascular problems by contacting general practitioners (GPs). This paper describes: (a) the feasibility of this approach; and (b) the agreement between survivor-reports and reports from their GP.

METHODS

The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) contacts all childhood cancer survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry since 1976 who survived at least 5 years from cancer diagnosis. We validated answers of all survivors who reported a cardiovascular problem in the questionnaire. Reported cardiovascular problems were hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, thrombosis, and valvular problems. In the questionnaire, we further asked survivors to provide a valid address of their GP and a consent for contact. We sent case-report forms to survivors' GPs and requested information on cardiovascular diagnoses of their patients. To determine agreement between information reported by survivors and GPs, we calculated Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficients for each category of cardiovascular problems.

RESULTS

We used questionnaires from 2172 respondents of the SCCSS. Of 290 survivors (13% of 2172) who reported cardiovascular problems, 166 gave consent to contact their GP and provided a valid address. Of those, 135 GPs (81%) replied, and 128 returned the completed case-report form. Survivor-reports were confirmed by 54/128 GPs (42%). Of the 54 GPs, 36 (28% of 128) confirmed the problems as reported by the survivors; 11 (9% of 128) confirmed the reported problem(s) and gave additional information on more cardiovascular outcomes; and seven GPs (5% of 128) confirmed some, but not all cardiovascular problems. Agreement between GPs and survivors was good for stroke (κ = 0.79), moderate for hypertension (κ = 0.51), arrhythmias (κ = 0.41), valvular problems (κ = 0.41) and thrombosis (κ = 0.56), and poor for coronary heart disease (κ = 0.15) and heart failure (κ = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite excellent GP compliance, it was found unfeasible to validate self-reported cardiovascular problems via GPs because they do not serve as gatekeepers in the Swiss health care system. It is thus necessary to develop other validation methods to improve the quality of patient-reported outcomes.

摘要

背景

流行病学研究通常依赖于自我报告的健康问题,而验证可以极大地提高研究质量。在一项关于儿童癌症后晚期效应的研究中,我们通过联系全科医生(GP)来验证自我报告的心血管问题。本文描述了:(a)这种方法的可行性;(b)幸存者报告与 GP 报告之间的一致性。

方法

瑞士儿童癌症幸存者研究(SCCSS)联系了自 1976 年以来在瑞士儿童癌症登记处注册的所有至少存活 5 年的儿童癌症幸存者。我们验证了问卷中报告有心血管问题的所有幸存者的答案。报告的心血管问题包括高血压、心律失常、充血性心力衰竭、心肌梗死、心绞痛、中风、血栓形成和瓣膜问题。在问卷中,我们进一步要求幸存者提供其 GP 的有效地址和同意联系的证明。我们向幸存者的 GP 发送了病例报告表,并要求提供其患者心血管诊断的信息。为了确定幸存者报告和 GP 报告之间的一致性,我们为每个心血管问题类别计算了 Cohen's kappa(κ)系数。

结果

我们使用了 SCCSS 的 2172 名受访者的问卷。在 290 名(2172 名的 13%)报告有心血管问题的幸存者中,有 166 名同意联系他们的 GP 并提供了有效的地址。其中,有 135 名 GP(81%)回复,128 名 GP 填写了完整的病例报告表。54/128 名 GP(42%)确认了幸存者的报告。在这 54 名 GP 中,有 36 名(128 名的 28%)确认了幸存者报告的问题;11 名(128 名的 9%)确认了报告的问题,并提供了更多心血管结果的额外信息;7 名 GP(128 名的 5%)确认了部分但不是全部心血管问题。GP 和幸存者之间的一致性很好,中风的一致性为 0.79,高血压为 0.51,心律失常为 0.41,瓣膜问题为 0.41,血栓形成为 0.56,冠心病为 0.15,心力衰竭为 0.32。

结论

尽管 GP 遵守率很高,但通过 GP 验证自我报告的心血管问题是不可行的,因为他们在瑞士医疗保健系统中不是把关人。因此,有必要开发其他验证方法来提高患者报告结果的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b4f/10921568/a44405c23d96/12875_2024_2322_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验