van Gelder Marleen M H J, Schouten Naomi P E, Merkus Peter J F M, Verhaak Chris M, Roeleveld Nel, Roukema Jolt
Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 16;17(6):e149. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3847.
Self-reported medical history information is included in many studies. However, data on the validity of Web-based questionnaires assessing medical history are scarce. If proven to be valid, Web-based questionnaires may provide researchers with an efficient means to collect data on this parameter in large populations.
The aim of this study was to assess the validity of a Web-based questionnaire on chronic medical conditions, allergies, and blood pressure readings against obstetric records and data from general practitioners.
Self-reported questionnaire data were compared with obstetric records for 519 pregnant women participating in the Dutch PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study from July 2011 through November 2012. These women completed Web-based questionnaires around their first prenatal care visit and in gestational weeks 17 and 34. We calculated kappa statistics (κ) and the observed proportions of positive and negative agreement between the baseline questionnaire and obstetric records for chronic conditions and allergies. In case of inconsistencies between these 2 data sources, medical records from the woman's general practitioner were consulted as the reference standard. For systolic and diastolic blood pressure, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for multiple data points.
Agreement between the baseline questionnaire and the obstetric record was substantial (κ=.61) for any chronic condition and moderate for any allergy (κ=.51). For specific conditions, we found high observed proportions of negative agreement (range 0.88-1.00) and on average moderate observed proportions of positive agreement with a wide range (range 0.19-0.90). Using the reference standard, the sensitivity of the Web-based questionnaire for chronic conditions and allergies was comparable to or even better than the sensitivity of the obstetric records, in particular for migraine (0.90 vs 0.40, P=.02), asthma (0.86 vs 0.61, P=.04), inhalation allergies (0.92 vs 0.74, P=.003), hay fever (0.90 vs 0.64, P=.001), and allergies to animals (0.89 vs 0.53, P=.01). However, some overreporting of allergies was observed in the questionnaire and for some nonsomatic conditions sensitivity of both measurement instruments was low. The ICCs for blood pressure readings ranged between 0.72 and 0.92 with very small mean differences between the 2 methods of data collection.
Web-based questionnaires can be used to validly collect data on many chronic disorders, allergies, and blood pressure readings among pregnant women.
许多研究都纳入了自我报告的病史信息。然而,关于基于网络的病史调查问卷有效性的数据却很匮乏。如果经证实有效,基于网络的调查问卷可能为研究人员提供一种在大量人群中收集该参数数据的有效方法。
本研究旨在评估一份关于慢性疾病、过敏和血压读数的基于网络的调查问卷相对于产科记录和全科医生数据的有效性。
将519名参与2011年7月至2012年11月荷兰孕期与婴儿发育(PRIDE)研究的孕妇的自我报告问卷数据与产科记录进行比较。这些女性在首次产前检查前后以及妊娠第17周和第34周完成了基于网络的调查问卷。我们计算了kappa统计量(κ)以及基线问卷与慢性疾病和过敏的产科记录之间阳性和阴性一致性的观察比例。如果这两个数据源之间存在不一致,则将该女性全科医生的病历作为参考标准进行查阅。对于收缩压和舒张压,计算了多个数据点的组内相关系数(ICC)。
对于任何慢性疾病,基线问卷与产科记录之间的一致性较高(κ = 0.61),对于任何过敏情况,一致性为中等(κ = 0.51)。对于特定疾病,我们发现阴性一致性的观察比例较高(范围为0.88 - 1.00),阳性一致性的平均观察比例中等,范围较宽(范围为0.19 - 0.90)。使用参考标准,基于网络的调查问卷对慢性疾病和过敏的敏感性与产科记录相当,甚至更好,特别是对于偏头痛(0.90对0.40,P = 0.02)、哮喘(0.86对0.61,P = 0.04)、吸入性过敏(0.92对0.74,P = 0.003)、花粉热(0.90对0.64,P = 0.001)以及动物过敏(0.89对0.53,P = 0.01)。然而,在问卷中观察到一些过敏情况报告过多,并且对于一些非躯体疾病,两种测量工具的敏感性都较低。血压读数的ICC在0.72至0.92之间,两种数据收集方法之间的平均差异非常小。
基于网络的调查问卷可用于有效收集孕妇中许多慢性疾病、过敏和血压读数的数据。