Bashir S A, Duffy S W, Qizilbash N
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;26(1):64-70. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.1.64.
Haemostatic factors are suspected to be involved in the aetiology of cerebrovascular events.
In a case-control study of 105 cases of transient ischaemic attack and minor ischaemic stroke, and 241 controls, data were available on levels of the haemostatic factors-von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI), tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and factor VII (FVII). These are subject to measurement error and within-person fluctuation of true levels, which may bias relative risk estimates. For all subjects, two determinations were performed on the same blood sample, which allowed estimation of pure measurement error. For estimation of within-person fluctuation, levels were measured from a repeat blood sample on 81 of the controls one year later.
The pure measurement error accounted for a very small proportion of the total variation in all cases. Uncorrected for within-person fluctuation, the odds ratio estimates associated with exceeding the median of vWF, PAI, TPA and FVII respectively were 1.88, 0.87, 1.30 and 0.93. After correction for within-person fluctuation odds ratios were 3.56, 0.80, 1.41 and 0.91. Because the PAI determination was not robust to storage conditions, it was estimated that 75% of the variation in this factor was within-person rather than between-persons. Thus, estimates of relative risk relation to PAI cannot be regarded as reliable in this study.
It is likely that elevated levels of vWF are associated with increased risk of ischaemic stroke, but interpretation must be tentative, due to relatively large within-person fluctuation of vWF levels.
止血因子被怀疑与脑血管事件的病因有关。
在一项病例对照研究中,纳入了105例短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中患者以及241名对照者,获取了止血因子——血管性血友病因子(vWF)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(PAI)、组织型纤溶酶原激活物(TPA)和凝血因子VII(FVII)的水平数据。这些数据存在测量误差以及真实水平的个体内波动,这可能会使相对风险估计产生偏差。对所有受试者,在同一血样上进行了两次测定,从而能够估计纯测量误差。为了估计个体内波动,一年后从81名对照者的重复血样中测量了这些水平。
纯测量误差在所有病例的总变异中占比非常小。未校正个体内波动时,vWF、PAI、TPA和FVII分别超过中位数的比值比估计值为1.88、0.87、1.30和0.93。校正个体内波动后,比值比分别为3.56、0.80、1.41和0.91。由于PAI的测定对储存条件不稳健,据估计该因子75%的变异是个体内的而非个体间的。因此,在本研究中,与PAI相关的相对风险估计不可靠。
vWF水平升高可能与缺血性卒中风险增加有关,但由于vWF水平个体内波动相对较大,解释必须谨慎。