Pell J P, Fowkes F G, Lee A J
Wolfson Unit for the Prevention of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, U.K.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997 Mar;13(3):315-21. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80104-9.
The aim of this study was to derive specific clinical indications for surgery in patients with chronic critical lower limb ischaemia and to determine the extent to which practice in Scotland conformed to these indications.
DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consensus on indications was achieved using a modified Delphi method in which a postal questionnaire was completed by 29 vascular surgeons on two occasions, with feedback between the rounds. Respondents indicated the appropriateness of arterial reconstruction and primary major amputation for 218 case scenarios comprising all possible combinations of clinical and angiographic findings.
Agreement was reached on 31 appropriate indications for major amputation and 65 for arterial reconstruction. In 10 hospitals in Scotland, 400 primary amputation and arterial reconstruction operations were reviewed retrospectively and compared with the indications. The clinical findings for 7 (4%) arterial reconstructions and 48 (24%) major amputations did not conform to the indications agreed by the Delphi method. The proportion of operations conforming to the agreed indications differed significantly by size of unit (p < 0.025).
This study shows that consensus can be reached on indications for surgery. However, in practice some operations performed do not conform with these indications. This discrepancy may be due to inappropriate practice.
本研究旨在得出慢性严重下肢缺血患者手术的具体临床指征,并确定苏格兰的实际做法符合这些指征的程度。
设计、材料与方法:采用改良德尔菲法就指征达成共识,29位血管外科医生分两次填写邮寄问卷,并在各轮之间进行反馈。受访者指出了动脉重建和一期大截肢对于218种病例情况(包括临床和血管造影结果的所有可能组合)的适宜性。
就31种大截肢的适宜指征和65种动脉重建的适宜指征达成了一致。对苏格兰10家医院的400例一期截肢和动脉重建手术进行了回顾性分析,并与指征进行比较。7例(4%)动脉重建和48例(24%)大截肢的临床结果不符合德尔菲法达成一致的指征。符合商定指征的手术比例因单位规模而异(p < 0.025)。
本研究表明可以就手术指征达成共识。然而,在实际操作中,一些手术并不符合这些指征。这种差异可能是由于操作不当所致。