• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不明原因不孕症中输卵管精子灌注与宫内人工授精的比较:一项随机、前瞻性、交叉试验。

Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial.

作者信息

Biacchiardi Chiara Perono, Revelli Alberto, Gennarelli Gianluca, Rustichelli Sergio, Moffa Federica, Massobrio Marco

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Unit, Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.015
PMID:14967388
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, cross-over study.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine unit of a university hospital.

PATIENT(S): Fifty-six couples with unexplained infertility.

INTERVENTION(S): COH was induced by recombinant FSH and monitored by serial transvaginal ultrasound. On the day of hCG administration during the first treatment cycle, patients were randomized to either IUI or FSP. Thereafter, in case no pregnancy was achieved, patients went on being treated with FSP and IUI in alternate cycles. A maximum of four treatment cycles per couple was performed. FSP was performed using a pediatric Foley's catheter inseminating 4 mL of sperm-enriched suspension; a Kremer-Delafontaine catheter delivering 0.5 mL of sperm suspension was used for IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle.

RESULT(S): One hundred twenty-seven cycles (58 FSP, 69 IUI) were performed. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 21.7% for IUI and 8.6% for FSP, respectively. No major adverse effects were recorded for either technique.

CONCLUSION(S): After COH, FSP is less effective than IUI in couples with unexplained infertility.

摘要

目的

比较在接受控制性卵巢刺激(COH)的不明原因不孕症患者中,输卵管内精子灌注(FSP)与标准宫腔内人工授精(IUI)的效果。

设计

随机、前瞻性、交叉研究。

地点

一所大学医院的生殖医学科。

患者

56对不明原因不孕症夫妇。

干预措施

采用重组促卵泡素诱导COH,并通过经阴道超声连续监测。在第一个治疗周期注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)当天,患者被随机分为接受IUI或FSP治疗。此后,如果未受孕,患者在交替周期中继续接受FSP和IUI治疗。每对夫妇最多进行4个治疗周期。FSP采用小儿Foley导管注入4毫升富含精子的悬液;IUI采用Kremer-Delafontaine导管注入0.5毫升精子悬液。

主要观察指标

每个周期的临床妊娠率。

结果

共进行了127个周期(58个FSP周期,69个IUI周期)。IUI每个周期的临床妊娠率为21.7%,FSP为8.6%。两种技术均未记录到重大不良反应。

结论

在COH后,对于不明原因不孕症夫妇,FSP的效果不如IUI。

相似文献

1
Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial.不明原因不孕症中输卵管精子灌注与宫内人工授精的比较:一项随机、前瞻性、交叉试验。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.015.
2
No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.在接受手术治疗的轻度至中度子宫内膜异位症患者与控制性卵巢刺激和宫内人工授精后不明原因不孕症患者之间,周期妊娠率和累积活产率没有差异。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Sep;86(3):566-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.044.
3
Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study.黄体期支持对宫腔内人工授精周期妊娠率的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
4
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2.
5
Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study.输卵管精子灌注与宫腔内输卵管内人工授精的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.025.
6
A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
Fertil Steril. 2001 Dec;76(6):1242-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02913-2.
7
Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography.通过子宫输卵管造影诊断为单侧输卵管阻塞的女性中,卵巢刺激和宫内人工授精治疗的作用。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.187. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
8
Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.一项随机对照试验,比较来曲唑超促排卵与重组促卵泡激素联合宫腔内人工授精,用于既往枸橼酸氯米芬刺激及宫腔内人工授精失败的不明原因不孕夫妇。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):678-83. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.099. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
9
Predictive value of the hemizona assay for pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination.半透明带试验对接受控制性卵巢刺激及宫内人工授精患者妊娠结局的预测价值
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.054. Epub 2006 May 6.
10
Effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor on the outcome of intrauterine insemination.外源性血小板活化因子处理精子对宫腔内人工授精结局的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):618-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.980.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomised Comparative Study of Standard IUI (sIUI) and Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion (FSP) for Clinical Pregnancy.标准宫腔内人工授精(sIUI)与输卵管精子灌注(FSP)用于临床妊娠的随机对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Aug;72(Suppl 1):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01583-x. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
3
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.
宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub4.