• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹主动脉瘤择期修复患者术前评估的当前实践。英国医院调查。

Current practice in the pre-operative assessment of patients for elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. A survey of UK hospitals.

作者信息

Pullman M D, Edwards N D

机构信息

University Department of Anaesthetics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1997 Apr;52(4):367-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.az0083b.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.az0083b.x
PMID:9135192
Abstract

A postal survey of 100 hospitals throughout the United Kingdom and Ireland was conducted to assess current practice in the pre-operative assessment and use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Seventy-four completed questionnaires were received. The survey revealed that 53% of respondents hold designated preoperative assessment clinics, attended by anaesthetists in 54% and cardiologists in 26%. However, only 4% of respondents have a written protocol for stratifying patients and assessing peri-operative risk. By far the commonest investigation of choice for further cardiological assessment is transthoracic echocardiography (67%). Other investigations of choice are multiple update gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (13%), dipyridamole thallium imaging (9%), exercise ECG (6%), stress echocardiography (1%) and stress MUGA (1%). Two units (3%) never undertook further investigation. Pulmonary artery flotation catheters are used as a routine by 9% of respondents, dependent upon left ventricular ejection fraction by 65%, dependent on other factors by 7% and not used at all by 19%. The survey reveals widespread variation in pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

摘要

对英国和爱尔兰的100家医院进行了一项邮政调查,以评估择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者术前评估及肺动脉导管使用的当前实践情况。共收到74份完整问卷。调查显示,53%的受访者设有指定的术前评估门诊,其中54%由麻醉师出诊,26%由心脏病专家出诊。然而,只有4%的受访者有对患者进行分层和评估围手术期风险的书面方案。到目前为止,进一步心脏评估最常用的检查方法是经胸超声心动图(67%)。其他常用检查方法包括多重门控心脏血池显像(MUGA)扫描(13%)、双嘧达莫铊显像(9%)、运动心电图(6%)、负荷超声心动图(1%)和负荷MUGA(1%)。有两个单位(3%)从未进行过进一步检查。9%的受访者常规使用肺动脉漂浮导管,65%根据左心室射血分数决定是否使用,7%根据其他因素决定是否使用,19%根本不使用。该调查揭示了择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者术前评估存在广泛差异。

相似文献

1
Current practice in the pre-operative assessment of patients for elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. A survey of UK hospitals.腹主动脉瘤择期修复患者术前评估的当前实践。英国医院调查。
Anaesthesia. 1997 Apr;52(4):367-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.az0083b.x.
2
Marked variation in venous thromboprophylaxis management for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; results of survey amongst vascular surgeons in the United kingdom.腹主动脉瘤修复术的静脉血栓预防管理存在明显差异;英国血管外科医生调查结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;42(5):591-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
3
Prediction of cardiac risk prior to elective abdominal aortic surgery: role of multiple gated acquisition scan.择期腹主动脉手术前心脏风险的预测:多门控采集扫描的作用。
World J Surg. 2003 Oct;27(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6970-3. Epub 2003 Aug 21.
4
Regional Differences in Case Mix and Peri-operative Outcome After Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Vascunet Database.Vascunet数据库中择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后病例组合及围手术期结局的区域差异
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;49(6):646-652. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
5
Dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy and gated radionuclide angiography to assess cardiac risk before abdominal aortic surgery.双嘧达莫-铊闪烁扫描术和门控放射性核素血管造影术用于评估腹主动脉手术前的心脏风险。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 10;330(10):663-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403103301002.
6
Sex-related trends in mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2002 and 2013 at National Health Service hospitals in England: less benefit for women compared with men.2002 年至 2013 年英格兰国民保健服务医院择期腹主动脉瘤手术后与性别相关的死亡率趋势:女性与男性相比获益较少。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 7;37(46):3452-3460. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw335. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
Current practice in the use of antiplatelet agents in the peri-operative period by UK vascular surgeons.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Mar;85(2):97-101. doi: 10.1308/003588403321219858.
8
Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic aneurysm surgery.主动脉瘤手术的筛查、诊断及进展
Gerontology. 2004 Nov-Dec;50(6):349-59. doi: 10.1159/000080172.
9
Elective versus ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis.择期与破裂腹主动脉瘤修复:1年成本效益分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2005 Nov;19(6):858-61. doi: 10.1007/s10016-005-7457-5.
10
Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放性复杂腹主动脉瘤修复术的当代疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Cardiac Stress Testing in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative.南加州血管结局改善协作组中的术前心脏应激测试
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 May;49:234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
Role of pre-operative multiple gated acquisition scanning in predicting long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.术前多门控采集扫描在预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者长期预后中的作用。
World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1939-3.
3
Comparison of risk-scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
腹主动脉瘤修复术后预测医院死亡率的风险评分系统比较
Int J Angiol. 2008 Winter;17(4):181-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278306.
4
Disparity in the risk stratification of major surgery.重大手术风险分层中的差异。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):W1-2. doi: 10.1308/147870808X303074.
5
Prediction of cardiac risk prior to elective abdominal aortic surgery: role of multiple gated acquisition scan.择期腹主动脉手术前心脏风险的预测:多门控采集扫描的作用。
World J Surg. 2003 Oct;27(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6970-3. Epub 2003 Aug 21.
6
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the pre-operative assessment of patients for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤修复术前患者评估中的心肺运动试验
Ir J Med Sci. 1998 Oct-Dec;167(4):238-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02937421.