Suppr超能文献

与格列本脲相比,米格列醇治疗对仅通过饮食控制血糖仍不理想的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的疗效及安全性。

The efficacy and safety of miglitol therapy compared with glibenclamide in patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by diet alone.

作者信息

Segal P, Feig P U, Schernthaner G, Ratzmann K P, Rybka J, Petzinna D, Berlin C

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):687-91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.687.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the therapeutic effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol (BAY m 1099), the sulfonylurea glibenclamide, and placebo on parameters of metabolic control and safety in patients with NIDDM that is inadequately controlled by diet alone.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 201 patients in 18 centers in 4 countries were randomized in a double-blind manner to miglitol (50 mg t.i.d., followed by 100 mg t.i.d.), glibenclamide (3.5 mg q.d/b.i.d.), or placebo for 24 weeks. Efficacy criteria were changes from baseline of HbA1c, fasting and postprandial blood glucose and insulin levels, body weight, and serum triglycerides.

RESULTS

Efficacy was assessed in 119 patients who completed the full protocol, and the results were similar to those obtained in 186 patients who fulfilled the validity criteria for analysis. Compared with placebo, mean baseline-adjusted HbA1c decreased by 0.75% (P = 0.0021) and 1.01% (P = 0.0001) in the miglitol and glibenclamide treatment groups, respectively. Blood glucose decreased slightly in the fasting state and considerably in the postprandial state in both treatment groups but not in the placebo group. Fasting insulin levels increased slightly (NS) in all treatment groups; however, postprandial insulin levels decreased with miglitol, while increasing markedly with glibenclamide (P = 0.0001 between all treatment groups). Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence and diarrhea) occurred mostly in the miglitol-treated patients, while some glibenclamide-treated patients had symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Miglitol monotherapy is effective and safe in NIDDM patients. Compared with glibenclamide, it reduced HbA1c less effectively and caused more gastrointestinal side effects. On the other hand, glibenclamide, unlike miglitol, tended to cause hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and weight gain, which are not desirable in patients with NIDDM.

摘要

目的

比较α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂米格列醇(BAY m 1099)、磺脲类药物格列本脲及安慰剂对仅通过饮食控制血糖仍不理想的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者代谢控制参数及安全性的治疗效果。

研究设计与方法

在为期4周的安慰剂导入期后,来自4个国家18个中心的201例患者被双盲随机分为米格列醇组(50mg每日3次,随后100mg每日3次)、格列本脲组(3.5mg每日1次/每日2次)或安慰剂组,治疗24周。疗效标准为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹及餐后血糖和胰岛素水平、体重及血清甘油三酯相对于基线的变化。

结果

对119例完成整个研究方案的患者进行疗效评估,结果与186例符合分析有效性标准的患者相似。与安慰剂相比,米格列醇组和格列本脲组基线调整后的平均HbA1c分别降低了0.75%(P = 0.0021)和1.01%(P = 0.0001)。两个治疗组的空腹血糖略有下降,餐后血糖显著下降,而安慰剂组则无此变化。所有治疗组的空腹胰岛素水平略有升高(无统计学意义);然而,米格列醇使餐后胰岛素水平降低,而格列本脲使其显著升高(所有治疗组之间P = 0.0001)。胃肠道副作用(胃肠胀气和腹泻)主要发生在米格列醇治疗的患者中,而一些格列本脲治疗的患者有低血糖症状。

结论

米格列醇单药治疗对NIDDM患者有效且安全。与格列本脲相比,它降低HbA1c的效果较差,且引起更多的胃肠道副作用。另一方面,与米格列醇不同,格列本脲往往会导致低血糖、高胰岛素血症和体重增加,这对NIDDM患者是不利的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验