Garratty G
American Red Cross Blood Service, Southern California Region, Los Angeles 90006, USA.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1996;18(3):321-44.
Although there are probably over a thousand publications on the associations of blood groups and disease, many are based totally on statistical analyses. Most of the earlier studies have been controversial, because they were small studies and/or had inadequate controls and/or had been analyzed incorrectly. Nevertheless, it is difficult to argue with the general pattern that emerges from the large body of statistical data on malignancy, coagulation and infection. Recent findings in membrane chemistry, rumor immunology and infectious disease (especially relating to bacterial receptors), add a scientific rationale for some of these findings, and there is an increasing rationale for some of the earlier statistical findings. Some of the more recent findings on parasitic/bacterial/viral receptors, the hematological abnormalities seen when high frequency blood group antigens are missing, and the association with immunologically important proteins are most convincing and suggest that blood group antigens do sometimes play a biological role; this role may relate directly, or often be completely unrelated, to the red cell.
尽管关于血型与疾病关联的出版物可能有一千多篇,但许多完全基于统计分析。大多数早期研究都存在争议,因为它们样本量小、对照不足和/或分析有误。然而,从大量关于恶性肿瘤、凝血和感染的统计数据中得出的总体模式很难被反驳。膜化学、肿瘤免疫学和传染病(尤其是与细菌受体相关的研究)方面的最新发现,为其中一些发现提供了科学依据,而且越来越多的早期统计发现也有了依据。关于寄生虫/细菌/病毒受体的一些最新发现、高频血型抗原缺失时出现的血液学异常,以及与免疫重要蛋白的关联,最具说服力,表明血型抗原有时确实发挥生物学作用;这种作用可能与红细胞直接相关,也可能往往完全无关。