Suppr超能文献

多发伤患者的选择性肠道去污:前瞻性对照试验。

Selective intestinal decontamination in multiple trauma patients: prospective, controlled trial.

作者信息

Lingnau W, Berger J, Javorsky F, Lejeune P, Mutz N, Benzer H

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):687-94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reduction of potential pathogens by selective intestinal decontamination has been proposed to improve intensive care. Despite large scientific interest in this method, little is known about its benefit in homogeneous trauma populations.

METHODS

In a prospective, controlled study, we enrolled non-infected trauma patients (age over 18 years, mechanical ventilation > or = 48 hours, intensive care for more than 3 days) who primarily were admitted to our university medical center. We randomized patients to be treated with two different topical regimens (polymyxin, tobramycin, and amphotericin (PTA) or polymyxin, ciprofloxin, amphotericin (PCA)) or the carrier only (placebo), administered four times daily both to the oropharynx and to the gastrointestinal tract. All patients received intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 mg, bd) for 4 days.

FINDINGS

Of 357 enrolled patients, 310 (age 38.0 +/- 16.5 years, Injury Severity Score 35.2 +/- 12.7) met all inclusion criteria. Selective decontamination successfully reduced intestinal bacterial colonization. However, we did not identify significant differences between groups regarding pneumonia (PTA 47.5%, PCA 39.0%, placebo 45.3%), sepsis (PTA 47.5%, PCA 37.8%, placebo 42.6%), multiple organ failure (PTA 56.3%; PCA 52.4%, placebo 58.1%), and death (PTA 11.3%, PCA 12.2%, placebo 10.8%). Total costs per patient were highest with the PTA regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no benefit of selective decontamination in trauma patients. Apparently, bacterial overgrowth in the intestinal tract is not the sole link between trauma, sepsis, and organ failure.

摘要

背景

通过选择性肠道去污减少潜在病原体已被提议用于改善重症监护。尽管该方法引起了广泛的科学关注,但对于其在同质化创伤人群中的益处知之甚少。

方法

在一项前瞻性对照研究中,我们纳入了主要入住我校医学中心的未感染创伤患者(年龄超过18岁,机械通气≥48小时,重症监护超过3天)。我们将患者随机分为两组,分别接受两种不同的局部用药方案(多粘菌素、妥布霉素和两性霉素(PTA)或多粘菌素、环丙沙星、两性霉素(PCA))或仅接受载体(安慰剂)治疗,每天对口腔和胃肠道给药4次。所有患者接受静脉注射环丙沙星(200毫克,每日两次),共4天。

结果

在357名纳入研究的患者中,310名(年龄38.0±16.5岁,损伤严重度评分35.2±12.7)符合所有纳入标准。选择性去污成功减少了肠道细菌定植。然而,我们未发现各组在肺炎(PTA组47.5%,PCA组39.0%,安慰剂组45.3%)、败血症(PTA组47.5%,PCA组37.8%,安慰剂组42.6%)、多器官功能衰竭(PTA组56.3%;PCA组52.4%,安慰剂组58.1%)和死亡(PTA组11.3%,PCA组12.2%,安慰剂组10.8%)方面存在显著差异。PTA方案的每位患者总费用最高。

结论

我们发现选择性去污对创伤患者没有益处。显然,肠道细菌过度生长并非创伤、败血症和器官衰竭之间的唯一联系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验