Terada T, Kinoshita Y, Yokote H, Tsuura M, Nakai K, Itakura T, Hyotani G, Kuriyama T, Naka Y, Kido T
Department of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical College, Japan.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(3):227-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01844756.
The effect of endovascular treatment for vasospasm was investigated by analysing the results of patients treated in Wakayama City in 1994.
Ninety nine patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms, who survived more than one week and were treated in Wakayama City in 1994, were studied. Twenty five patients caused symptomatic vasospasm and 25 were treated by endovascular therapy, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and/or intra-arterial papaverine infusion (IAP). PTA was performed for proximal vasospasm which located in the main arterial trunk, such as ICA, M1, BA (n = 3). IAP was chosen for distal vasospasm which located mainly in the M2, A1, A2 (n = 12). PTA and/or IAP was performed for diffuse vasospasm which located in proximal and distal arteries (n = 10).
In the proximal vasospasm group, all patients were good to moderately disabled on the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). In the distal vasospasm group, 8 patients were good to moderately disabled, and 4 patients were severely disabled. The overall results were as follows: 17 (68%), good to moderately disabled, 4 (16%), severely disabled, 4 (16%), dead. The morbidity and mortality rate was 8/25 (32%) in symptomatic spasm group.
PTA was very effective especially for proximal vasospasm, but IAP was not always effective for distal or diffuse vasospasm. Diffuse vasospasm revealed a high mortality rate in spite of the endovascular therapy.
通过分析1994年和歌山市接受治疗患者的结果,研究血管内治疗血管痉挛的效果。
研究了1994年在和歌山市接受治疗、存活超过一周的99例脑动脉瘤破裂患者。25例患者出现症状性血管痉挛,其中25例接受了血管内治疗,即经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)和/或动脉内罂粟碱输注(IAP)。对位于主要动脉干如颈内动脉、M1、基底动脉的近端血管痉挛进行PTA治疗(n = 3)。对主要位于M2、A1、A2的远端血管痉挛选择IAP治疗(n = 12)。对位于近端和远端动脉的弥漫性血管痉挛进行PTA和/或IAP治疗(n = 10)。
在近端血管痉挛组,所有患者在格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)上的预后为良好至中度残疾。在远端血管痉挛组,8例患者预后良好至中度残疾,4例患者严重残疾。总体结果如下:17例(68%)良好至中度残疾,4例(16%)严重残疾,4例(16%)死亡。症状性痉挛组的发病率和死亡率为8/25(32%)。
PTA对近端血管痉挛特别有效,但IAP对远端或弥漫性血管痉挛并非总是有效。尽管进行了血管内治疗,弥漫性血管痉挛的死亡率仍很高。