Kalman J M, Olgin J E, Saxon L A, Lee R J, Scheinman M M, Lesh M D
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco 94143-1354, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;8(2):121-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00775.x.
Although the circuit in typical counterclockwise atrial flutter has been clearly delineated, the mechanisms of "atypical atrial flutters" have been less well characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ECG and electrophysiologic (EP) characteristics of atypical atrial flutter.
Thirty-three patients with at least one form of atypical atrial flutter underwent EP evaluation with multipolar atrial activation and entrainment mapping. Nineteen patients with clockwise flutter had: (1) stereotypic ECG morphology; (2) same cycle length as counterclockwise flutter; (3) clockwise activation around the tricuspid annulus; (4) recording of discrete split potentials along the length of the crista terminalis, suggesting the presence of conduction block; (5) concealed entrainment from the low right atrial isthmus; (6) successful ablation in this isthmus. Twenty patients with atypical flutter not consistent with a clockwise mechanism ("true atypical flutter") showed: (1) heterogeneous ECG morphology; (2) cycle length shorter than that of clockwise flutter; (3) frequent transitions from and to atrial fibrillation; (4) could be entrained in only six patients and, when accomplished, demonstrated surface fusion when entraining from the low right atrial isthmus.
Atypical flutter falls into two broad categories. Clockwise flutter uses the same circuit with the same endocardial barriers as its counterclockwise counterpart and is best considered a form of typical flutter. True atypical flutter induced in the EP laboratory is a heterogeneous group of arrhythmias that are transitional to atrial fibrillation. Although it may superficially resemble clockwise or counterclockwise flutter based on the 12-lead ECG alone, the distinction can be readily made from a combined evaluation including activation and entrainment mapping.
尽管典型逆时针心房扑动的折返环已被明确界定,但“非典型心房扑动”的机制尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在探讨非典型心房扑动的心电图和电生理(EP)特征。
33例至少有一种形式非典型心房扑动的患者接受了多极心房激动和拖带标测的EP评估。19例顺时针扑动患者具有以下特点:(1)心电图形态刻板;(2)与逆时针扑动的周期长度相同;(3)围绕三尖瓣环顺时针激动;(4)沿界嵴长度记录到离散的分裂电位,提示存在传导阻滞;(5)低位右房峡部隐匿性拖带;(6)在此峡部成功消融。20例不符合顺时针机制的非典型扑动患者(“真正的非典型扑动”)表现为:(1)心电图形态各异;(2)周期长度短于顺时针扑动;(3)频繁发作和终止于房颤;(4)仅6例患者可被拖带,且拖带时从低位右房峡部拖带时出现体表融合。
非典型扑动可分为两大类。顺时针扑动与逆时针扑动使用相同的折返环及相同的心内膜屏障,最好将其视为典型扑动的一种形式。在EP实验室诱发的真正非典型扑动是一组过渡到房颤的异质性心律失常。尽管仅根据12导联心电图其可能表面上类似于顺时针或逆时针扑动,但通过包括激动和拖带标测的综合评估可轻易做出区分。