Lai L P, Lin J L, Lin L J, Chen W J, Ho Y L, Tseng Y Z, Chen C H, Lee Y T, Lien W P, Huang S K
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.
Heart. 1998 Jul;80(1):80-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.80.1.80.
To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters.
Traditionally, the ECG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern.
The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The ECG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists.
The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters.
The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.
制定用于鉴别逆时针和顺时针心房扑动的新心电图标准。
传统上,逆时针和顺时针心房扑动的心电图鉴别基于下壁导联的扑动波极性。然而,扑动波极性的判定具有主观性,有时还很困难,尤其是在呈起伏形态的扑动波中。
该研究纳入了37例连续的药物难治性心房扑动患者;其中30例为逆时针心房扑动,17例为顺时针心房扑动(10例患者两种心房扑动形式均有)。通过拖带研究和导管消融证实了峡部依赖性。比较了两种类型心房扑动的心电图模式,并由四位独立的心脏病专家确定下壁导联的扑动波极性。
在逆时针心房扑动中,下壁导联的扑动波极性在24例中呈阴性,1例呈阳性,5例不明确;在顺时针心房扑动中,极性在1例中呈阴性,10例呈阳性,6例不明确。然而,所有逆时针心房扑动的aVF导联与I导联扑动波振幅比均>2.5,而所有顺时针心房扑动的该比值均<2.5。在所有逆时针心房扑动中,下壁导联的扑动波最低点对应于V1导联的上升支,但在所有顺时针心房扑动中,对应于V1导联的下降支。
下壁导联的扑动波极性与扑动波旋转方向的相关性不佳。然而,新的心电图标准能够以较高的准确性鉴别逆时针和顺时针心房扑动。