Walker A M, Szneke P, Bianchi L A, Field L G, Sutherland L R, Dreyer N A
Epidemiology Resources, Inc., Newton Lower Falls, Massachusetts 02162, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 May;92(5):816-20.
The choice between sulfasalazine and 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) drugs in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis often depends on idiosyncrasies of drug tolerance and control of the disease in individual patients. We sought to evaluate whether there were population differences in the effect of 5-ASA and sulfasalazine on the occurrence of clinically recognized adverse events. We also attempted to determine whether there were differences in the use of concomitant steroids and in the rates of hospitalization.
We reviewed a large computerized database drawn from general practices in the United Kingdom. There we found records of 2894 patients in whom general practitioners had diagnosed ulcerative colitis, and who were receiving ongoing medical therapy specific to ulcerative colitis. The period of data availability ran from the beginning of 1990 to the latter part of 1993. The average duration of observation was 2.1 yr per patient. Patient histories were categorized into distinct periods according to the dose of 5-ASAs and sulfasalazine, steroids, and immunosuppressants, and were further separated according to the activity of ulcerative colitis. Within these categories, we examined the initiation and discontinuation of steroids, incidence of new hospitalizations for ulcerative colitis, and clinical mention of adverse events.
New clinical mentions of hepatic, pancreatic, renal, and hematological events other than anemia were similar among the 5-ASAs and were very infrequent overall. Hospitalizations for ulcerative colitis occurred with similar frequency (about 15 hospitalizations per 100 patients per year) among users of those drugs. Patients receiving sulfasalazine had lower rates of initiation of prednisolone than did patients receiving 5-ASA, but sulfasalazine was used proportionately less often in patients who had been recently hospitalized, and it may be that sulfasalazine patients were somewhat less sick, overall, than were 5-ASA-using patients. The choice of drug did not affect discontinuation rates for prednisolone among established users.
In the United Kingdom, during the period of this study, serious adverse reactions to drugs were not an important aspect of the management of patients with ulcerative colitis. Renal and pancreatic complications of sulfasalazine and 5-ASA therapy were extremely rare. Sulfasalazine and 5-ASA drugs have similar steroid-sparing properties. Disease-specific hospitalizations are approximately 100 times more common in ulcerative colitis patients than are serious adverse drug effects. Considerations of drug efficacy should therefore dominate the choice between therapeutic agents.
在溃疡性结肠炎患者的治疗中,柳氮磺胺吡啶和5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)类药物的选择通常取决于个体患者的药物耐受性特点和疾病控制情况。我们试图评估5-ASA和柳氮磺胺吡啶在临床公认不良事件发生方面的效果是否存在人群差异。我们还试图确定在联合使用类固醇药物的情况以及住院率方面是否存在差异。
我们查阅了一个来自英国全科医疗的大型计算机化数据库。在那里我们找到了2894例患者的记录,这些患者被全科医生诊断为溃疡性结肠炎,并且正在接受针对溃疡性结肠炎的持续药物治疗。数据可得期从1990年初至1993年下半年。每位患者的平均观察时长为2.1年。患者病史根据5-ASA类药物和柳氮磺胺吡啶、类固醇及免疫抑制剂的剂量被分类为不同时期,并根据溃疡性结肠炎的活动情况进一步细分。在这些类别中,我们检查了类固醇药物的起始和停用情况、溃疡性结肠炎新的住院发生率以及不良事件的临床提及情况。
除贫血外,5-ASA类药物在肝脏、胰腺、肾脏和血液学事件方面新的临床提及情况相似,总体上非常少见。这些药物使用者中溃疡性结肠炎的住院发生率相似(每年每100例患者约15次住院)。接受柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗的患者泼尼松龙起始率低于接受5-ASA治疗的患者,但柳氮磺胺吡啶在近期住院患者中的使用比例相对较低,总体而言柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗的患者病情可能比使用5-ASA治疗的患者稍轻。药物选择对已使用者中泼尼松龙的停用率没有影响。
在英国,在本研究期间,药物严重不良反应并非溃疡性结肠炎患者治疗的重要方面。柳氮磺胺吡啶和5-ASA治疗的肾脏和胰腺并发症极为罕见。柳氮磺胺吡啶和5-ASA类药物具有相似的节省类固醇特性。特定疾病的住院在溃疡性结肠炎患者中比严重药物不良反应常见约100倍。因此,药物疗效的考量应在治疗药物选择中占主导地位。