Cecere M C, Gürtler R E, Canale D, Chuit R, Cohen J E
Biology Department, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1997 Apr;1(4):273-9. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49891997000400003.
The purpose of this study was to identify the origin of Triatoma infestans reinfestation and study its dynamics following spraying with deltamethrin inside and around 94 houses in three rural communities in northwestern Argentina. The effectiveness of the spraying was evaluated immediately after the houses were sprayed and two months later. In addition, five residual peridomiciliary foci were found and sprayed, as well as three preexisting ones that had not been sprayed. To monitor reinfestation, biosensors were placed in the houses and each family was also asked to capture triatomines and keep them in plastic bags; in addition, triatomines were searched for in and around houses, using an aerosol that dislodged them from their hiding places. Selective sprayings were carried out only where a colony of T. infestans was found. During the 30 months of follow-up, the percentage of houses in which any T. infestans were captured varied between 3% and 9%. In six houses, T. infestans were captured during more than one evaluation. The number of peridomiciliary areas found to be infested (19) was double the number of infested houses (9). Colonies of T. infestans were found only in the peridomiciliary areas, where the number of T. infestans captured was six times higher than in the houses. Chickens were the host most frequently associated with peridomiciliary foci. This area was the origin and principal source of reinfestation. To reduce the speed of reinfestation and the frequency with which sprayings are needed, the following environmental and chemical control methods must be combined in the peridomiciliary area: reduce the number of hiding places of triatomines; restrict the raising of birds to structures that cannot be colonized by triatomines; apply an insecticide that is less likely to be degraded by exposure to the elements, or perform a second spraying 6 to 12 months after the first; and employ a device for early detection of the presence of T. infestans around houses.
本研究的目的是确定侵袭锥蝽再次侵扰的来源,并研究在阿根廷西北部三个农村社区的94所房屋内部及周边喷洒溴氰菊酯后其动态变化。房屋喷洒后立即以及两个月后评估了喷洒效果。此外,发现并喷洒了五个室外残留疫源地,以及三个未喷洒过的原有疫源地。为监测再次侵扰情况,在房屋中放置了生物传感器,还要求每个家庭捕获锥蝽并将其保存在塑料袋中;此外,使用气雾剂将房屋内外的锥蝽从其藏身之处驱赶出来进行搜寻。仅在发现侵袭锥蝽群体的地方进行选择性喷洒。在30个月的随访期间,捕获到任何侵袭锥蝽的房屋百分比在3%至9%之间变化。在六所房屋中,在不止一次评估中捕获到了侵袭锥蝽。发现受侵扰的室外区域数量(19个)是受侵扰房屋数量(9所)的两倍。仅在室外区域发现了侵袭锥蝽群体,在这些区域捕获的侵袭锥蝽数量比在房屋中高六倍。鸡是与室外疫源地最常相关的宿主。该区域是再次侵扰的起源和主要来源。为降低再次侵扰的速度以及所需喷洒的频率,必须在室外区域结合以下环境和化学控制方法:减少锥蝽的藏身之处数量;将禽类饲养限制在锥蝽无法栖息的结构中;使用一种不太可能因暴露于环境因素而降解的杀虫剂,或在第一次喷洒后6至12个月进行第二次喷洒;以及采用一种用于早期检测房屋周边侵袭锥蝽存在的装置。