Suppr超能文献

E试验与琼脂稀释法检测淋病奈瑟菌对阿奇霉素敏感性的比较。

Comparison of E-test with agar dilution methods in testing susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae to azithromycin.

作者信息

Yasin R M, Suan K A, Meng C Y

机构信息

Bacteriology Division, Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1997 May;24(5):257-60. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199705000-00004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Neisseria gonorrhoeae varies from one country to another and may also change with time. To monitor these variations and changes, it is desirable to have a method that is simple and reproducible. This study was undertaken to determine the in vitro susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and to assess the reliability of results obtained using E-test methodology for determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of azithromycin.

STUDY DESIGN

The MICs for 135 clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae were determined by a modified Kirby-Bauer method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards against penicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, norfloxacin, tetracycline, kanamycin, spectinomycin, and azithromycin. The MIC of azithromycin was determined by both the E-test and agar dilution method. All tests were done simultaneously.

RESULTS

The MIC of azithromycin to all 135 isolates ranged from 0.078 to 0.25 microgram/ml with the agar dilution method and from 0.016 to 0.50 microgram/ml with the E-test. The MIC50 and MIC90 of azithromycin were 0.064 microgram/ml and 0.125 microgram/ml, respectively, by the agar dilution method, whereas they are slightly higher by the E-test method. Seventy-six of the isolates were beta-lactamase producers and 69 were high-level tetracycline-resistant N. gonorrhoeae. There was no difference in the MIC50 and MIC90 of azithromycin in these groups of isolates. The percentage agreement within the acceptable +/-1 log2 dilution difference between MICs obtained by E-test and those obtained by the agar dilution method was 97.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin has a very good in vitro antigonococcal activity, and the E-test is a reliable method to determine the MIC of azithromycin against N. gonorrhoeae.

摘要

背景与目的

淋病奈瑟菌的抗菌药敏模式因国家而异,且可能随时间变化。为监测这些变异和变化,需要一种简单且可重复的方法。本研究旨在确定淋病奈瑟菌对阿奇霉素的体外敏感性,并评估使用E-test法测定阿奇霉素最低抑菌浓度(MIC)所得结果的可靠性。

研究设计

采用美国国家临床实验室标准委员会推荐的改良 Kirby-Bauer 法,测定135株淋病奈瑟菌临床分离株对青霉素、头孢呋辛、头孢曲松、诺氟沙星、四环素、卡那霉素、壮观霉素和阿奇霉素的MIC。阿奇霉素的MIC通过E-test法和琼脂稀释法同时测定。

结果

琼脂稀释法测定的135株分离株对阿奇霉素的MIC范围为0.078至0.25微克/毫升,E-test法测定的范围为0.016至0.50微克/毫升。琼脂稀释法测定的阿奇霉素MIC50和MIC90分别为0.064微克/毫升和0.125微克/毫升,而E-test法测定的值略高。76株分离株为β-内酰胺酶产生菌,69株为高水平四环素耐药淋病奈瑟菌。这些分离株组中阿奇霉素的MIC50和MIC90无差异。E-test法与琼脂稀释法所得MIC在可接受的±1 log2稀释差异范围内的百分比一致性为97.8%。

结论

阿奇霉素具有良好的体外抗淋球菌活性,E-test法是测定阿奇霉素对淋病奈瑟菌MIC的可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验