Domjan M, Gillan D J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Oct;3(4):322-34.
Exposure to taste or spatial cues previously paired with lithium administration resulted in more drinking during a test session started 15 min. later than did exposure to stimuli previously presented in the absence of drug treatment (Experiments 1, 2, 4, and 5). This outcome reflected an elevation of intake above baseline levels (Experiment 1) and required the presence of the lithium-paired cues rather than merely a history of lithium injections (Experiments 1, 2, 4, and 5). The increased drinking was evident in tests with novel (Experiments 1, 4, and 5) as well as familiar (Experiment 2) palatable solutions and was not attributable to a greater degree of thirst in subjects exposed to the lithium-predictive cues (Experiments 4 and 5). The phenomenon was attenuated by extinction of the lithium-conditioned stimuli (Experiment 3). However, the increased drinking aftereffect probably was not a result of the conditioned aversiveness of lithium-predictive cues, since shock-conditioned stimuli did not elicit enhanced consumption (Experiment 5). Various explanations of the effect are discussed.
与锂给药之前配对的味觉或空间线索暴露,在比未接受药物治疗时呈现过的刺激暴露晚15分钟开始的测试阶段,会导致更多饮水(实验1、2、4和5)。这一结果反映了摄入量高于基线水平(实验1),且需要存在与锂配对的线索,而不仅仅是有注射锂的经历(实验1、2、4和5)。在使用新颖(实验1、4和5)以及熟悉(实验2)的美味溶液进行的测试中,饮水增加是明显的,并且这并非归因于暴露于锂预测线索的受试者有更强烈的口渴感(实验4和5)。锂条件刺激的消退减弱了这一现象(实验3)。然而,饮水增加的后效应可能不是锂预测线索的条件厌恶所致,因为经电击条件化的刺激并未引发饮水量增加(实验5)。文中讨论了对该效应的各种解释。