Giveon S, Kahan E, Kitai E
Home Care Unit, Shomron District of Kupat Holim, Israel.
Acad Med. 1997 May;72(5):388-90. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199705000-00020.
To identify the factors that encourage or deter family medicine physicians and residents in Israel from participating in research.
In October 1995, a questionnaire containing items on demographic variables, research attitudes, and academic and research activities in primary care settings was mailed to a random sample of 200 family medicine physicians and residents (out of approximately 600) employed by the General Sick Fund, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel. The questionnaire also contained items regarding difficulties in participating in research and asked for opinions about several general statements about research in family practice.
In all, 190 physicians responded, for a response rate of 95%. Based on their responses, the respondents were divided into four groups by amount of research involvement. Univariate analysis using the chi-square test was used for the comparison of variables among the four groups. The respondents reporting greater knowledge of and involvement in research were, by and large, men (p = .01) who were qualified specialists with academic status (p < .00001). They also taught students (p = .0005) and residents (p < .0005), participated in more conferences (p < .0005), and while in residency training had had a mentor who encouraged involvement in research (p = .0001).
Research is essential to family medicine with regard to both primary care practice and academic activities, its development, however, has been inhibited. Given the results of this preliminary study, family medicine residency programs would be well advised to assign a research mentor to every resident; also, time and resources should be devoted to research in postgraduate training programs. Perhaps more important, women physicians in Israel should be encouraged to participate more actively in research, and support for them in their special needs should be made available.
确定促使或阻碍以色列家庭医学医生及住院医师参与研究的因素。
1995年10月,向以色列最大的健康维护组织——通用疾病基金所雇佣的200名家庭医学医生及住院医师(约600人中随机抽取)邮寄了一份问卷,内容包括人口统计学变量、研究态度以及基层医疗环境中的学术和研究活动。问卷还包含有关参与研究的困难的项目,并询问对家庭医疗中一些关于研究的一般性陈述的看法。
共有190名医生回复,回复率为95%。根据回复情况,将受访者按研究参与程度分为四组。使用卡方检验进行单因素分析以比较四组间的变量。报告对研究有更多了解且参与度更高的受访者总体上是男性(p = 0.01),是具有学术地位的合格专科医生(p < 0.00001)。他们还教授学生(p = 0.0005)和住院医师(p < 0.0005),参加更多会议(p < 0.0005),并且在住院医师培训期间有一位鼓励参与研究的导师(p = 0.0001)。
研究对于家庭医学在基层医疗实践和学术活动方面都至关重要,然而其发展受到了抑制。鉴于这项初步研究的结果,家庭医学住院医师培训项目最好为每位住院医师安排一名研究导师;此外,应在研究生培训项目中投入时间和资源用于研究。或许更重要的是,应鼓励以色列的女医生更积极地参与研究,并为她们的特殊需求提供支持。