• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

携手共创卓越初级医疗服务:来自新加坡一名初级医疗服务提供者的观点

PAIR UP for primary care excellence: perspectives from a primary healthcare provider in Singapore.

作者信息

Tan Ngiap Chuan

机构信息

Department of Research, SingHealth Polyclinics Head Office, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One, Tower 5, #15-10, Singapore 150167.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):110-5; quiz 116. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014030.

DOI:10.11622/smedj.2014030
PMID:24664374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4293979/
Abstract

Singapore is facing an increasing noncommunicable disease burden due to its ageing population. Singapore's primary healthcare services, provided by both polyclinic physicians and private general practitioners, are available to the public at differential fees for service. The resultant disproportionate patient loads lead to dissatisfaction for both healthcare providers and consumers. This article describes the 'PAIR UP' approach as a potential endeavour to facilitate primary care physicians (PCPs) in public and private sectors to collaborate to deliver enhanced primary care in Singapore. PAIR UP is an acronym referring to Policy, Academic development, Integration of healthcare information system, Research in primary care, Utility and safety evaluation, and Practice transformation. The current healthcare landscape is favourable to test out this multipronged approach. PCPs in both sectors can ride on it and work together synergistically to provide quality primary care in Singapore.

摘要

由于人口老龄化,新加坡面临着日益加重的非传染性疾病负担。新加坡的基层医疗服务由综合诊疗所医生和私人全科医生提供,公众可按不同的服务收费标准使用这些服务。由此导致的患者负荷不均衡,让医疗服务提供者和消费者都感到不满。本文介绍了“PAIR UP”方法,这是一项潜在的举措,旨在促进公共和私营部门的基层医疗医生合作,以在新加坡提供更高质量的基层医疗服务。PAIR UP是一个首字母缩写词,代表政策(Policy)、学术发展(Academic development)、医疗信息系统整合(Integration of healthcare information system)、基层医疗研究(Research in primary care)、效用和安全性评估(Utility and safety evaluation)以及实践转型(Practice transformation)。当前的医疗环境有利于试验这种多管齐下的方法。两个部门的基层医疗医生都可以借此协同合作,在新加坡提供高质量的基层医疗服务。

相似文献

1
PAIR UP for primary care excellence: perspectives from a primary healthcare provider in Singapore.携手共创卓越初级医疗服务:来自新加坡一名初级医疗服务提供者的观点
Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):110-5; quiz 116. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014030.
2
2001 survey on primary medical care in Singapore.2001年新加坡初级医疗保健调查。
Singapore Med J. 2004 May;45(5):199-213.
3
Physician factors affecting patient preferences in selecting a primary care provider: A qualitative research study in Singapore.影响患者选择初级保健提供者偏好的医师因素:新加坡的一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 1;19(3):e0298823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298823. eCollection 2024.
4
Experiences of doctors working in Singapore's public primary healthcare clinics.在新加坡公立基层医疗诊所工作的医生的经历。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1948-e1958. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13626. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Priorities for family physician and general practitioner recruitment and retention in Singapore: a PRIORITIZE study.新加坡家庭医生和全科医生招聘和留用的优先事项:一项 PRIORITIZE 研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 16;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01570-1.
6
Academic geriatrics in Singapore.新加坡的老年医学学术。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2145-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03630.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Vouchers for primary healthcare services in an ageing world? The perspectives of elderly voucher recipients in Hong Kong.老龄化世界中的基层医疗服务代金券?香港老年代金券领取者的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):374-382. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12523. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
Prepared and highly committed despite the risk of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians' concerns and coping strategies in Singapore.尽管存在 COVID-19 感染风险,仍做好充分准备并高度投入:新加坡初级保健医生关注问题和应对策略的横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 16;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01370-7.
9
Education and training in family medicine: progress and a proposed national vision for 2030.家庭医学教育与培训:进展及2030年国家愿景提案
Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):117-23. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014031.
10
Attitudes toward integration of complementary and alternative medicine in primary care: perspectives of patients, physicians and complementary practitioners.对补充和替代医学融入初级保健的态度:患者、医生和补充医学从业者的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Perspective on The Göktaş Definition of Family Medicine/General Practice: A Review of Singapore Quality.关于家庭医学/全科医学的戈克塔什定义的视角:新加坡质量综述
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):1187-1192. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.11382.
2
Integrated patient-centred care for type 2 diabetes in Singapore Primary Care Networks: a mixed-methods study.新加坡基层医疗保健网络中 2 型糖尿病的以患者为中心的综合护理:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 18;14(6):e083992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083992.
3
Analysis of the factors influencing the effectiveness of local government's purchase of older adults care services - a grounded theory study based on typical cases.基于典型案例的扎根理论研究:影响地方政府购买老年人护理服务效果的因素分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;11:1202472. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202472. eCollection 2023.
4
The Impact of a Revised National Childhood Immunization Schedule on Vaccination Defaulters.修订后的国家儿童免疫规划对疫苗接种未完成者的影响。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;11(4):859. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040859.
5
Comment on Surendran et al. The Missed Opportunity of Patient-Centered Medical Homes to Thrive in an Asian Context. 2021, , 1817.评论 Surendran 等人的文章:以患者为中心的医疗之家在亚洲语境中未能蓬勃发展的错失机遇。2021 年, ,1817。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084683.
6
Health outcomes of patients with chronic disease managed with a healthcare kiosk in primary care: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.在初级保健中使用医疗信息亭管理慢性病患者的健康结局:一项试点随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e020265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020265.
7
Let it go.随它去吧。
Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):109. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014026.

本文引用的文献

1
Research consultation clinic: impetus towards facilitating primary care research.研究咨询诊所:推动初级保健研究的动力。
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2013 Sep 16;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1447-056X-12-4.
2
Evaluation of a quality improvement curriculum for family medicine residents.对家庭医学住院医师质量改进课程的评估。
Fam Med. 2013 Jan;45(1):19-25.
3
Development of a competency framework for quality improvement in family medicine: a qualitative study.家庭医学质量改进能力框架的制定:一项定性研究。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Summer;32(3):174-80. doi: 10.1002/chp.21142.
4
Knowledge translation of research findings.研究成果的知识转化。
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.
5
A survey of the attitude and practice of research among doctors in Riyadh Military Hospital Primary Care Centers, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得军事医院初级保健中心医生研究态度与实践的调查。
J Family Community Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):38-42. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.94012.
6
Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.系统评价:公布患者护理绩效数据可改善护理质量的证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):111-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00006.
7
Global health and primary care research.全球卫生与初级保健研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):518-26. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070172.
8
Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.基于实践的研究——美国国立卫生研究院路线图上的“蓝色高速公路”。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.403.
9
General practice: professional preparation for a pandemic.全科医疗:应对大流行的专业准备
Med J Aust. 2006 Nov 20;185(S10):S66-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00711.x.
10
The Australian response: pandemic influenza preparedness.澳大利亚的应对措施:大流行性流感防范
Med J Aust. 2006 Nov 20;185(s10):S35-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00704.x.