• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Neurological issues.

作者信息

Donovan W H, Brown D J, Ditunno J F, Dollfus P, Frankel H L

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas--Houston Medical School 77096, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 1997 May;35(5):275-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100449.

DOI:10.1038/sj.sc.3100449
PMID:9160450
Abstract

The case histories of two patients who had had a spinal cord injury (SCI) were selected by the senior author and sent to four experts in the field of SCI. Based on the 1992 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and International Medical Society of Paraplegia (IMSOP) standards, the four participants plus the senior author recorded the motor and sensory scores, the ASIA impairment scale (AIS), the neurological level (NL) and the zone of partial preservation (ZPP). Several minor scoring errors occurred among the participants, especially with motor scores when key muscles could not be tested due to pain, or external immobilization devices. Difficulties with interpretation occurred with the motor levels and the ZPP for the patient with a complete injury. This exercise points to the need for all examiners of SCI patients to thoroughly familiarize themselves with the standards and to use the motor and sensory scores to arrive at a NL and ZPP. They also indicate a need to revise the standards to clarify the determination of sensory levels and how to score muscles whose strength is inhibited by pain.

摘要

相似文献

1
Neurological issues.
Spinal Cord. 1997 May;35(5):275-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100449.
2
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: classification skills of clinicians versus computational algorithms.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:临床医生的分类技能与计算算法对比
Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):324-31. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.221. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
3
A test of the 1992 International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.1992年脊髓损伤神经学与功能分类国际标准的一项测试。
Spinal Cord. 1998 Aug;36(8):554-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100602.
4
Sacral sparing in SCI: beyond the S4-S5 and anorectal examination.SCI 中的骶骨保留:超越 S4-S5 水平和肛门直肠检查。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):389-400.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.028. Epub 2012 May 8.
5
Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level.克服重重困难:使用神经控制的混合辅助肢体外骨骼对慢性脊髓损伤进行康复治疗的预期效果。根据年龄和损伤水平对55例患者进行的亚组分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS171.
6
Feasibility of using training cases from International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set for testing of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury items.使用国际脊髓损伤核心数据集的训练病例来测试脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准项目的可行性。
Spinal Cord. 2014 Dec;52(12):919-22. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.141. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
7
Functional motor preservation below the level of injury in subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A spinal cord injuries.美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级 A 级损伤患者的损伤以下部位的运动功能保留。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):905-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.024. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
8
Computer implementation of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury for consistent and efficient derivation of its subscores including handling of data from not testable segments.计算机实现国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准,以便一致、高效地推导其亚评分,包括处理无法测试节段的数据。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Feb 10;29(3):453-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2085. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
9
The revised zone of partial preservation (ZPP) in the 2019 International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: ZPP applicability in incomplete injuries.2019 年《国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准》修订的部分保留区(ZPP):ZPP 在不完全损伤中的适用性。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Feb;62(2):79-87. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00950-x. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
10
Characterization of neurological recovery following traumatic sensorimotor complete thoracic spinal cord injury.创伤性感觉运动完全性胸段脊髓损伤后神经功能恢复的特点。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):463-71. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.140. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.在脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准方面实现评估者的准确性。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):994-1001. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.67. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A Systematic Review.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)感觉成分的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Summer;21(3):241-9. doi: 10.1310/sci2103-241. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.
急性创伤性脊髓损伤患者的功能障碍评估:文献系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug;28(8):1445-77. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1152. Epub 2010 Apr 6.