• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variability in susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin and azithromycin due to medium pH.由于培养基pH值导致的流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素敏感性的变异性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun;35(6):1311-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1311-1315.1997.
2
Validation of NCCLS macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae tested with the Haemophilus test medium. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.用嗜血杆菌检测培养基对流感嗜血杆菌进行NCCLS大环内酯类(阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和红霉素)解释标准的验证。美国国家临床实验室标准委员会。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90027-2.
3
Influence of variations in test methods on susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin.检测方法的差异对流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和泰利霉素敏感性的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):43-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.43-46.2001.
4
Incidence of antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae in clinical isolates from patients with otitis media.中耳炎患者临床分离株中耐抗生素肺炎链球菌和β-内酰胺酶阳性流感嗜血杆菌的发生率。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S3-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00001.
5
Activity of gatifloxacin against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, including susceptibility test development, E-test comparisons, and quality control guidelines for H. influenzae.加替沙星对流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌的活性,包括药敏试验的建立、E试验比较以及流感嗜血杆菌的质量控制指南。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1999-2002. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1999-2002.1999.
6
A time-kill evaluation of clarithromycin and azithromycin against two extracellular pathogens and the development of resistance.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对两种细胞外病原体的杀菌活性评估及耐药性发展
Ann Pharmacother. 1999 Dec;33(12):1262-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.19074.
7
In vitro susceptibilities of 180 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.180株流感嗜血杆菌临床分离株对氨苄西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、头孢克洛、头孢呋辛、头孢噻肟、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的体外敏感性。
Acta Clin Belg. 1996;51(4):237-43. doi: 10.1080/22953337.1996.11718516.
8
Macrolide susceptibility and beta-lactamase production among haemophilus influenzae isolates in the United States, 1996-1997.1996 - 1997年美国流感嗜血杆菌分离株的大环内酯类药物敏感性及β-内酰胺酶产生情况
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Dec;42(12):3313-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.12.3313.
9
Multisite reproducibility of results obtained by two broth dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex.两种肉汤稀释法对鸟分枝杆菌复合群进行药敏试验所得结果的多中心可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):627-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.627-631.2003.
10
Selection of resistance of telithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and streptococci in comparison with macrolides.与大环内酯类药物相比,泰利霉素对流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌和链球菌的耐药性选择。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Aug;54(2):542-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh339. Epub 2004 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints and quality control criteria for ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 μg.EUCAST 折点和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦 10-4μg 质量控制标准的制定。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;37(6):1047-1053. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3215-9. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Analysis of MIC and Disk Diffusion Testing Variables for Gepotidacin and Comparator Agents against Select Bacterial Pathogens.吉泊替尼及对照药物针对特定细菌病原体的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和纸片扩散试验变量分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1767-1777. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02366-16. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
3
Influence of variations in test methods on susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin.检测方法的差异对流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和泰利霉素敏感性的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):43-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.43-46.2001.
4
Dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin efficacies against experimental Haemophilus influenzae pulmonary infection.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对实验性流感嗜血杆菌肺部感染疗效的动态变化
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep;42(9):2385-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2385.

本文引用的文献

1
Reassessment of methods for testing the susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin.对流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素敏感性检测方法的重新评估。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Apr;37(4):845-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.4.845.
2
Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: use of frequency distribution curves, scattergrams, and regression analyses to compare in vitro activities and describe cross-resistance.红霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素:利用频率分布曲线、散点图和回归分析比较体外活性并描述交叉耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Oct;37(10):2080-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.10.2080.
3
Validation of NCCLS macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae tested with the Haemophilus test medium. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.用嗜血杆菌检测培养基对流感嗜血杆菌进行NCCLS大环内酯类(阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和红霉素)解释标准的验证。美国国家临床实验室标准委员会。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90027-2.
4
Relative potencies of azithromycin, clarithromycin and five other orally administered antibiotics.阿奇霉素、克拉霉素及其他五种口服抗生素的相对效价
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Apr;35(4):552-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.4.552.
5
Effect of adjustment of the pH upon sensitivity of urinary gram-negative bacilli to nine antibiotics.pH值调整对尿中革兰氏阴性杆菌对九种抗生素敏感性的影响。
Int Z Klin Pharmakol Ther Toxikol. 1971 Apr;4(3):325-7.
6
Enhancing effect on alkalinization of the medium on the activity of erythromycin against gram-negative bacteria.对培养基碱化对红霉素抗革兰氏阴性菌活性的增强作用。
Appl Microbiol. 1968 Sep;16(9):1288-92. doi: 10.1128/am.16.9.1288-1292.1968.
7
Comparative in vitro activities of new 14-, 15-, and 16-membered macrolides.新型14元、15元及16元大环内酯类药物的体外活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Nov;32(11):1710-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.11.1710.
8
Variability of clarithromycin and erythromycin susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae in four different broth media and correlation with the standard disk diffusion test.四种不同肉汤培养基中克拉霉素和红霉素对流感嗜血杆菌药敏试验的变异性及其与标准纸片扩散法的相关性
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2415-20. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2415-2420.1988.
9
Enhancement of the in vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae by 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin, its major metabolite in humans.14-羟基克拉霉素(克拉霉素在人体内的主要代谢产物)增强了克拉霉素对流感嗜血杆菌的体外和体内活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1407-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1407.
10
In vitro susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: review of new National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations.流感嗜血杆菌的体外药敏试验:美国国家临床实验室标准委员会新建议综述
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3035-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3035-3038.1992.

由于培养基pH值导致的流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素敏感性的变异性。

Variability in susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin and azithromycin due to medium pH.

作者信息

Nilius A M, Beyer J M, Flamm R K, Tanaka S K

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Research, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-3500, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun;35(6):1311-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1311-1315.1997.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.35.6.1311-1315.1997
PMID:9163435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC229740/
Abstract

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) methods for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae in Haemophilus test medium allow a pH range of 7.2 to 7.4. However, it is known that bacteria may appear to be less susceptible to macrolides at lower pHs. Forty-four strains of H. influenzae were tested for their susceptibilities to clarithromycin and azithromycin by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates appeared to be less susceptible at pH 7.2 than at pH 7.4 by both methods. Clarithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 43% of the isolates by the disk diffusion method and against 52% of the isolates by the broth microdilution method. Similarly, azithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 41 and 45% of the isolates by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods, respectively. Forty-two isolates were classified as clarithromycin susceptible and all isolates were classified as azithromycin susceptible by the disk diffusion method, regardless of the medium pH. However, only 21 isolates were clarithromycin susceptible at pH 7.2 and 34 isolates were susceptible at pH 7.4 by the broth microdilution method, even though quality control results indicated valid testing at both pHs. This study indicated that the results of tests of the susceptibility of H. influenzae with clarithromycin and azithromycin are highly dependent on the pH of the medium. Test results and their interpretations varied even when the medium pH was within the NCCLS-approved range and, coupled with the current NCCLS breakpoint of 8 microg/ml in the case of clarithromycin, may explain some of the observed discordances between the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods.

摘要

美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)在嗜血杆菌检测培养基中进行流感嗜血杆菌药敏试验的方法允许pH值范围为7.2至7.4。然而,已知在较低pH值下细菌对大环内酯类药物的敏感性可能会降低。采用纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法对44株流感嗜血杆菌进行了对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的药敏试验。两种方法均显示,分离株在pH 7.2时比在pH 7.4时似乎更不易感。通过纸片扩散法,克拉霉素在pH 7.2时对43%的分离株活性较低;通过肉汤微量稀释法,对52%的分离株活性较低。同样,通过纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法,阿奇霉素在pH 7.2时分别对41%和45%的分离株活性较低。通过纸片扩散法,42株分离株被分类为对克拉霉素敏感,所有分离株均被分类为对阿奇霉素敏感,无论培养基pH值如何。然而,通过肉汤微量稀释法,尽管质量控制结果表明在两个pH值下检测均有效,但在pH 7.2时只有21株分离株对克拉霉素敏感,在pH 7.4时有34株分离株敏感。本研究表明,流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素药敏试验的结果高度依赖于培养基的pH值。即使培养基pH值在NCCLS批准的范围内,试验结果及其解释也会有所不同,并且结合当前克拉霉素8μg/ml的NCCLS折点,可能解释了纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法之间观察到的一些不一致情况。