• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin efficacies against experimental Haemophilus influenzae pulmonary infection.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对实验性流感嗜血杆菌肺部感染疗效的动态变化
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep;42(9):2385-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2385.
2
Bacteriological efficacies of three macrolides compared with those of amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.三种大环内酯类药物与阿莫西林-克拉维酸相比对肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌的细菌学疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Dec;42(12):3193-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.12.3193.
3
Efficacy of azithromycin, clarithromycin and beta-lactam agents against experimentally induced bronchopneumonia caused by Haemophilus influenzae in mice.阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和β-内酰胺类药物对小鼠实验性流感嗜血杆菌所致支气管肺炎的疗效。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Sep;48(3):425-30. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.3.425.
4
Validation of NCCLS macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae tested with the Haemophilus test medium. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.用嗜血杆菌检测培养基对流感嗜血杆菌进行NCCLS大环内酯类(阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和红霉素)解释标准的验证。美国国家临床实验室标准委员会。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90027-2.
5
Influence of variations in test methods on susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin.检测方法的差异对流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和泰利霉素敏感性的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):43-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.43-46.2001.
6
Influence of macrolide susceptibility on efficacies of clarithromycin and azithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a murine lung infection model.在小鼠肺部感染模型中,大环内酯类药物敏感性对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素抗肺炎链球菌疗效的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Feb;47(2):739-46. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.739-746.2003.
7
History of macrolide use in pediatrics.儿科中使用大环内酯类药物的历史。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Apr;16(4):427-31. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199704000-00025.
8
A time-kill evaluation of clarithromycin and azithromycin against two extracellular pathogens and the development of resistance.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对两种细胞外病原体的杀菌活性评估及耐药性发展
Ann Pharmacother. 1999 Dec;33(12):1262-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.19074.
9
Azithromycin Pharmacodynamics against Persistent Haemophilus influenzae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.阿奇霉素对慢性阻塞性肺疾病中持续性流感嗜血杆菌的药效动力学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01995-17. Print 2018 Feb.
10
Effect of efflux on telithromycin and macrolide susceptibility in Haemophilus influenzae.外排作用对流感嗜血杆菌中泰利霉素和大环内酯类药物敏感性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Mar;50(3):893-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.3.893-898.2006.

引用本文的文献

1
The anti-biofilm effect of macrolides in a rat model of S. aureus foreign-body infection: Might it be of clinical relevance?大环内酯类药物在金黄色葡萄球菌异物感染大鼠模型中的抗生物膜效应:是否具有临床相关性?
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2017 Feb;206(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s00430-016-0479-5. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
2
Relationship between azithromycin susceptibility and administration efficacy for nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae respiratory infection.阿奇霉素敏感性与非分型流感嗜血杆菌呼吸道感染给药疗效之间的关系。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2700-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04447-14. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
3
Comparative bacteriological efficacy of pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated amoxicillin MICs and Haemophilus influenzae.药代动力学增强型阿莫西林-克拉维酸对阿莫西林最低抑菌浓度升高的肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌的比较细菌学疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Mar;49(3):908-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.908-915.2005.
4
Sialylation of lipooligosaccharides promotes biofilm formation by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.脂寡糖的唾液酸化促进不可分型流感嗜血杆菌生物膜的形成。
Infect Immun. 2004 Jan;72(1):106-13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.106-113.2004.
5
Efficacies of ABT-773, a new ketolide, against experimental bacterial infections.新型酮内酯ABT-773对实验性细菌感染的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Sep;45(9):2585-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2585-2593.2001.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability in susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin and azithromycin due to medium pH.由于培养基pH值导致的流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素敏感性的变异性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun;35(6):1311-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1311-1315.1997.
2
In vivo activity and pharmacodynamics of amoxicillin in combination with fosfomycin in fibrin clots infected with highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.阿莫西林与磷霉素联用在感染高度耐青霉素肺炎链球菌的纤维蛋白凝块中的体内活性及药效学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Sep;40(9):2062-66. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.9.2062.
3
Single-dose intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and cefuroxime in volunteer subjects.阿奇霉素、克拉霉素、环丙沙星和头孢呋辛在志愿者体内的单剂量肺内药代动力学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jul;40(7):1617-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.7.1617.
4
Comparative pharmacodynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin against respiratory pathogens.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对呼吸道病原体的比较药效学
Infection. 1995 Sep-Oct;23(5):316-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01716300.
5
In vitro activity of clarithromycin, cefprozil, and other common oral antimicrobial agents against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens.克拉霉素、头孢丙烯及其他常见口服抗菌药物对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体的体外活性。
Clin Ther. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):107-13.
6
Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: use of frequency distribution curves, scattergrams, and regression analyses to compare in vitro activities and describe cross-resistance.红霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素:利用频率分布曲线、散点图和回归分析比较体外活性并描述交叉耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Oct;37(10):2080-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.10.2080.
7
A new model examining intracellular and extracellular activity of amoxicillin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin in infected cells.一种研究阿莫西林、阿奇霉素和克拉霉素在受感染细胞内和细胞外活性的新模型。
Chemotherapy. 1993 Nov-Dec;39(6):416-23. doi: 10.1159/000238987.
8
Validation of NCCLS macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae tested with the Haemophilus test medium. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.用嗜血杆菌检测培养基对流感嗜血杆菌进行NCCLS大环内酯类(阿奇霉素、克拉霉素和红霉素)解释标准的验证。美国国家临床实验室标准委员会。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;18(4):243-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90027-2.
9
Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and of erythromycin.克拉霉素和红霉素的肺内药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):334-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.2.334.
10
Relative potencies of azithromycin, clarithromycin and five other orally administered antibiotics.阿奇霉素、克拉霉素及其他五种口服抗生素的相对效价
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Apr;35(4):552-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.4.552.

克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对实验性流感嗜血杆菌肺部感染疗效的动态变化

Dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin efficacies against experimental Haemophilus influenzae pulmonary infection.

作者信息

Alder J D, Ewing P J, Nilius A M, Mitten M, Tovcimak A, Oleksijew A, Jarvis K, Paige L, Tanaka S K

机构信息

Experimental Therapeutics and Pharmacology, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep;42(9):2385-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2385.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.42.9.2385
PMID:9736568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC105838/
Abstract

The dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin efficacy against pulmonary Haemophilus influenzae infection in rats were evaluated. Efficacy was measured by reduction in pulmonary H. influenzae burden on days 3 and 7 postinoculation. Clarithromycin therapy was effective on day 3 or 7 of therapy, while azithromycin was effective on day 7 but not on day 3 of therapy. Both macrolides produced marked efficacy against all six strains of H. influenzae tested, including four strains for which MICs were above the susceptible breakpoint (8 microgram/ml) concentration of clarithromycin. The two macrolides demonstrated markedly different pharmacokinetic characteristics, with clarithromycin present in both blood and tissue, while azithromycin was concentrated primarily in tissue. During pulmonary infection in rats, H. influenzae was found in both intracellular locations and an extracellular location in the lung. Blood concentrations of clarithromycin and azithromycin approximated human pharmacokinetics, and the blood concentrations for either macrolide rarely exceeded MICs for H. influenzae. At dosages producing blood concentrations similar to values achieved clinically, clarithromycin produced efficacy on day 3 of therapy, while both clarithromycin and azithromycin were equally effective on day 7. The different dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin suggest that length of therapy should be considered as a key parameter in evaluations of drug efficacy.

摘要

评估了克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对大鼠肺部流感嗜血杆菌感染的疗效动态。通过接种后第3天和第7天肺部流感嗜血杆菌负荷的降低来衡量疗效。克拉霉素治疗在治疗的第3天或第7天有效,而阿奇霉素在第7天有效,但在治疗的第3天无效。两种大环内酯类药物对所有六种测试的流感嗜血杆菌菌株均产生显著疗效,包括四种对克拉霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)高于敏感断点(8微克/毫升)的菌株。这两种大环内酯类药物表现出明显不同的药代动力学特征,克拉霉素存在于血液和组织中,而阿奇霉素主要集中在组织中。在大鼠肺部感染期间,在肺的细胞内和细胞外位置均发现了流感嗜血杆菌。克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的血药浓度接近人体药代动力学,两种大环内酯类药物的血药浓度很少超过流感嗜血杆菌的MIC。在产生与临床实际达到的值相似的血药浓度的剂量下,克拉霉素在治疗的第3天产生疗效,而克拉霉素和阿奇霉素在第7天同样有效。克拉霉素和阿奇霉素不同的疗效动态表明,在评估药物疗效时,治疗时长应被视为一个关键参数。