Rodgers M, Miller J E
Bridge House Medical Centre, Cheshire.
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Mar;47(416):161-5.
Patients on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for osteoporosis prevention rather than menopausal symptom control may be asymptomatic, despite inadequate replacement and low serum oestradiol (E2) levels. In the primary health care setting, therapeutic monitoring of HRT is not carried out routinely so that patients with serum E2 levels inadequate to protect bone may be missed.
To determine the proportion of women on transdermal E2 preparations with serum E2 levels insufficient to protect bone and to assess the value of a questionnaire-derived menopausal symptom score (MSS) for detecting these patients.
A cross-sectional analysis of 45 patients aged 35-70 years using transdermal E2 preparations obtained from a computer register of 14500 patients in a suburban practice. One blood sample was obtained from each patient at the time the MSS questionnaire was completed. Serum E2 concentration was measured using a fluoroimmunoassay and compared with the MSS. Levels below 150 pmol/l were considered to be insufficient to protect bone. The diagnostic accuracy of the MSS in screening for levels below 150 pmol/l was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
The median (95% CI) serum E2 was 147 pmol/l (126-198 pmol/l) and levels were below 150 pmol/l in 24 out of 45 patients. There was no difference in the MSS (median, 95% CI) between those with serum E2 < 150 pmol/l (8.5, 5.0-17) and > or = 150 pmol/l (9.0, 5.0-14; P = 0.477). The degree of association between the serum E2 and the MSS, using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, rs (95% CI) was small and not significant (-0.04, -0.34 to 0.26; P = 0.398). ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.51 (0.33-0.68).
More than half the women were inadequately replaced to protect against osteoporosis. Furthermore, the MSS was of no value in screening for those with low serum E2 levels. Serum E2 levels should be monitored in women on HRT for osteoporosis prevention and the E2 dosage adjusted accordingly.
接受激素替代疗法(HRT)以预防骨质疏松症而非控制更年期症状的患者可能没有症状,尽管替代不足且血清雌二醇(E2)水平较低。在初级卫生保健机构中,HRT的治疗监测并非常规进行,因此可能会遗漏血清E2水平不足以保护骨骼的患者。
确定使用经皮E2制剂的女性中血清E2水平不足以保护骨骼的比例,并评估基于问卷的更年期症状评分(MSS)在检测这些患者方面的价值。
对45例年龄在35 - 70岁使用经皮E2制剂的患者进行横断面分析,这些患者来自郊区一家诊所14500名患者的计算机登记册。在完成MSS问卷时,从每位患者采集一份血样。使用荧光免疫分析法测量血清E2浓度,并与MSS进行比较。低于150 pmol/l的水平被认为不足以保护骨骼。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定MSS在筛查低于150 pmol/l水平时的诊断准确性。
血清E2的中位数(95%CI)为147 pmol/l(126 - 198 pmol/l),45例患者中有24例水平低于150 pmol/l。血清E2 < 150 pmol/l的患者(中位数,95%CI)的MSS(8.5,5.0 - 17)与血清E2≥150 pmol/l的患者(9.0,5.0 - 14;P = 0.477)之间没有差异。使用Spearman等级相关系数rs(95%CI),血清E2与MSS之间的关联程度较小且不显著(-0.04,-0.34至0.26;P = 0.398)。ROC曲线分析显示曲线下面积(95%CI)为0.51(0.33 - 0.68)。
超过一半的女性替代不足,无法预防骨质疏松症。此外,MSS在筛查血清E2水平低的患者方面没有价值。对于接受HRT以预防骨质疏松症的女性,应监测血清E2水平,并相应调整E2剂量。