Armitage R, Yonkers K, Cole D, Rush A J
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Depart. of Psychiatry 75235-9070, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Jun;17(3):161-8. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199706000-00004.
This study was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group investigation that compared the effects of nefazodone and fluoxetine on sleep architecture and on clinician- and patient-rated sleep measures in 43 outpatients with moderate to severe, nonpsychotic major depressive disorder and insomnia. Twenty-two patients received nefazodone 200 mg daily for 1 week, followed by 400 mg daily for 7 weeks. Twenty-one patients received fluoxetine 20 mg daily. Dosage increases (to 500 mg/day for nefazodone and 40 mg/day for fluoxetine) were available after day 29, depending on clinician judgement. Sleep parameters were measured during baseline phase, while patients were unmeasured and symptomatic, and at weeks 2, 4, and 8 of treatment. Nefazodone and fluoxetine were equally effective as antidepressants. However, compared with baseline, nefazodone increased sleep efficiency and reduced the number of awakenings and percent awake and movement time, whereas fluoxetine increased the number of awakenings and did not significantly alter sleep efficiency or percent awake and movement time. Although fluoxetine increased stage 1 sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) latency and reduced total percent REM sleep, nefazodone increased REM sleep, decreased REM latency, and did not alter stage 1 sleep. Differences between treatment groups, based on change from baseline, revealed greater sleep efficiency, fewer awakenings, less percent awake and movement time, less percent stage 1 and more REM sleep, and shorter REM latency for nefazodone compared with fluoxetine. Significantly greater improvement in clinician- and patient-rated sleep disturbance was found with nefazodone compared with fluoxetine. Nefazodone was associated with better sleep quality.
本研究是一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组调查,比较了奈法唑酮和氟西汀对43例中度至重度非精神病性重度抑郁症伴失眠门诊患者睡眠结构以及临床医生和患者评定的睡眠指标的影响。22例患者每日服用200 mg奈法唑酮,持续1周,随后每日服用400 mg,持续7周。21例患者每日服用20 mg氟西汀。根据临床医生的判断,在第29天后可增加剂量(奈法唑酮增至500 mg/天,氟西汀增至40 mg/天)。在基线期(患者未接受治疗且有症状时)以及治疗的第2、4和8周测量睡眠参数。奈法唑酮和氟西汀作为抗抑郁药同样有效。然而,与基线相比,奈法唑酮提高了睡眠效率,减少了觉醒次数、清醒时间百分比和运动时间百分比,而氟西汀增加了觉醒次数,并未显著改变睡眠效率、清醒时间百分比或运动时间百分比。虽然氟西汀增加了1期睡眠和快速眼动(REM)潜伏期,并减少了REM睡眠总百分比,但奈法唑酮增加了REM睡眠,缩短了REM潜伏期,且未改变1期睡眠。基于与基线变化的治疗组间差异显示,与氟西汀相比,奈法唑酮的睡眠效率更高、觉醒次数更少、清醒时间百分比和运动时间百分比更低、1期睡眠百分比更低、REM睡眠更多,且REM潜伏期更短。与氟西汀相比,奈法唑酮在临床医生和患者评定的睡眠障碍方面有更显著的改善。奈法唑酮与更好的睡眠质量相关。