Gillin J C, Rapaport M, Erman M K, Winokur A, Albala B J
University of California, San Diego, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 May;58(5):185-92. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n0502.
Previous small trials have suggested that nefazodone does not suppress rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep or increase REM latency in depressed patients, in contrast to fluoxetine. The effects of nefazodone and fluoxetine on sleep architecture and on clinician- and patient-rated sleep measures were directly compared in this 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.
Forty-four outpatients with moderate to severe, nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (DSM-III-R) and insomnia were randomly assigned to receive nefazodone (Days 1-7, 200 mg/day; Days 8-56, 400 mg/day) or fluoxetine (Days 1-56, 20 mg/day). Sleep measures were obtained at baseline, while patients were unmedicated, and at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 of treatment.
In 43 evaluable patients (23 nefazodone, 20 fluoxetine), nefazodone and fluoxetine demonstrated similar antidepressant efficacy. All significant values were p < .05. Fluoxetine significantly decreased sleep efficiency and REM sleep and increased number of awakenings, Stage 1 sleep, and REM latency compared with baseline. In contrast, nefazodone significantly decreased percentage of awake and movement time and did not alter sleep efficiency or number of awakenings, Stage 1 or REM sleep, or REM latency compared with baseline. Nefazodone was associated with significantly less change from baseline for sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, percentage of awake and movement time, percentage of REM and Stage 1 sleep, and REM latency compared with fluoxetine. Both fluoxetine- and nefazodone-treated patients also showed significant improvement in some clinician- and patient-rated sleep disturbance scores, but nefazodone-treated patients improved to a significantly greater extent than fluoxetine-treated patients in most measures.
While nefazodone and fluoxetine showed equivalent antidepressant efficacy, more objective, subjective, and clinician-rated measures of sleep disturbance were improved during treatment with nefazodone than with fluoxetine. These results suggest that antidepressant effects of medications can occur independently of drug-induced changes in objective, subjective, and clinician-rated measures of sleep. Further studies, including parallel placebo-controlled comparisons with nefazodone, are needed to further test this hypothesis.
先前的小型试验表明,与氟西汀不同,奈法唑酮不会抑制抑郁症患者的快速眼动(REM)睡眠或增加REM潜伏期。在这项为期8周的多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究中,直接比较了奈法唑酮和氟西汀对睡眠结构以及临床医生和患者评定的睡眠指标的影响。
44例患有中度至重度、非精神病性重度抑郁症(DSM-III-R)且伴有失眠的门诊患者被随机分配接受奈法唑酮(第1 - 7天,200毫克/天;第8 - 56天,400毫克/天)或氟西汀(第1 - 56天,20毫克/天)治疗。在基线时(患者未用药)以及治疗的第2、4和8周获取睡眠指标。
在43例可评估患者(23例接受奈法唑酮治疗,20例接受氟西汀治疗)中,奈法唑酮和氟西汀显示出相似的抗抑郁疗效。所有显著值均为p < 0.05。与基线相比,氟西汀显著降低了睡眠效率和REM睡眠,并增加了觉醒次数、第1阶段睡眠和REM潜伏期。相比之下,奈法唑酮显著降低了清醒和活动时间的百分比,与基线相比未改变睡眠效率、觉醒次数、第1阶段或REM睡眠或REM潜伏期。与氟西汀相比,奈法唑酮治疗组患者的睡眠效率、觉醒次数、清醒和活动时间百分比、REM和第1阶段睡眠百分比以及REM潜伏期与基线相比的变化显著更小。接受氟西汀和奈法唑酮治疗的患者在一些临床医生和患者评定的睡眠障碍评分方面也有显著改善,但在大多数指标上,接受奈法唑酮治疗的患者改善程度明显大于接受氟西汀治疗的患者。
虽然奈法唑酮和氟西汀显示出同等的抗抑郁疗效,但与氟西汀相比,奈法唑酮治疗期间在更客观、主观以及临床医生评定的睡眠障碍指标方面有更多改善。这些结果表明,药物的抗抑郁作用可能独立于药物引起的客观、主观以及临床医生评定的睡眠指标变化而发生。需要进一步研究,包括与奈法唑酮进行平行安慰剂对照比较,以进一步验证这一假设。