Nowotny N, Bascuñana C R, Ballagi-Pordány A, Gavier-Widén D, Uhlén M, Belák S
Institute of Virology, Veterinary University of Vienna, Austria.
Arch Virol. 1997;142(4):657-73. doi: 10.1007/s007050050109.
A 398 bp fragment of the capsid protein (VP60) gene of 39 clinical samples of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) and 17 of European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV), collected between 1981 and 1995 from 17 countries, was amplified by PCR and directly sequenced. The alignment of the nucleotide sequences and the subsequently constructed phylogenetic tree clearly separated RHDV from EBHSV as phylogenetic entities. The nucleotide homology rates between the RHDV and EBHSV groups ranged between 52.6% and 60.0%. The homology rates within the groups were much higher, 89.4% to 100% for the RHDV samples, and 89.4% to 100% for the EBHSV specimens. No intermediate viruses were found. Despite the high homology, three main branches could be identified in the phylogenetic tree of the RHDV samples, corresponding to the epizootiological data, while the EBHSV dendrogram did not show such well defined branches. The present results support the classification of RHDV and EBHSV as two distinct members of the Caliciviridae family. Nevertheless, a comparison with previously determined sequences of other caliciviruses shows that RHDV and EBHSV are more closely related to each other than to any other calicivirus.
1981年至1995年间从17个国家收集的39份兔出血症病毒(RHDV)临床样本和17份欧洲棕兔综合征病毒(EBHSV)样本的衣壳蛋白(VP60)基因的398 bp片段,通过PCR扩增并直接测序。核苷酸序列的比对以及随后构建的系统发育树清楚地将RHDV与EBHSV作为系统发育实体区分开来。RHDV和EBHSV组之间的核苷酸同源率在52.6%至60.0%之间。组内的同源率要高得多,RHDV样本为89.4%至100%,EBHSV样本为89.4%至100%。未发现中间病毒。尽管同源性很高,但在RHDV样本的系统发育树中可以识别出三个主要分支,这与流行病学数据相对应,而EBHSV的树状图没有显示出如此明确的分支。目前的结果支持将RHDV和EBHSV分类为杯状病毒科的两个不同成员。然而,与先前确定的其他杯状病毒序列的比较表明,RHDV和EBHSV彼此之间的关系比与任何其他杯状病毒的关系更密切。