Suppr超能文献

特定大都市地区的便利店抢劫案。员工受伤的风险因素。

Convenience store robberies in selected metropolitan areas. Risk factors for employee injury.

作者信息

Amandus H E, Hendricks S A, Zahm D, Friedmann R, Block C, Wellford C, Brensilber D, Bynum T, McManus R, Malcan J, Weiss J C, Kessler D

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WVa, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 1997 May;39(5):442-7. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199705000-00010.

Abstract

Circumstances of injury were abstracted from police reports for 1835 convenience store robberies that occurred during 1992 or 1993 in selected metropolitan areas of seven eastern states. Subset analyses were performed using the data (758 robberies) from four states with relatively complete risk factor information. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of injury in a robbery situation for various risk factors. The overall risk of employee robbery-related injury could not be estimated because the probability of robbery is unknown. Of the 1835 robberies, 59% of the total robberies occurred at nighttime (9 p.m. to 3 a.m.), 47% occurred in stores previously robbed in the study period, 63% involved the use of a firearm, and 12% were associated with an injury to at least one employee. In the subset analysis of 758 robberies in four states, the employee probability of injury in a robbery was lower with firearm use compared with no weapon or use of a blunt instrument, and the probability of severe injury (defined as death, or an injury necessitating a trip to a hospital) was lower with a firearm compared with the use of a blunt instrument. However, all five fatalities were firearm-related. Other factors that were associated with a lower probability of employee injury included robbery occurrence in stores that had been robbed multiple times, compared with stores robbed only once; having 1 to 999 dollars stolen, compared with having no money stolen; and the presence of a customer(s) in the store at the time of the robbery. The employee risk of injury was not significantly different between one- (0.106) and multiple-employee (0.111) stores. Similarly, the employee risk of severe injury was not significantly different between one- (0.029) and multiple-employee stores (0.022). We conclude that there are several potential risk factors for employee injury in convenience store robberies, some of which are amenable to interventions. Further research on these factors and their relationship to employee injury is indicated.

摘要

伤害情况取自1992年或1993年在东部七个州的部分大都市地区发生的1835起便利店抢劫案的警方报告。使用来自四个拥有相对完整风险因素信息的州的数据(758起抢劫案)进行了子集分析。本研究的目的是估计抢劫情况下各种风险因素导致受伤的风险。由于抢劫概率未知,因此无法估计员工与抢劫相关的总体受伤风险。在这1835起抢劫案中,59%的抢劫案发生在夜间(晚上9点至凌晨3点),47%发生在研究期间之前被抢劫过的商店,63%涉及使用枪支,12%与至少一名员工受伤有关。在对四个州的758起抢劫案的子集分析中,与未使用武器或使用钝器相比,抢劫时使用枪支导致员工受伤的概率较低,与使用钝器相比,使用枪支导致重伤(定义为死亡或需要前往医院治疗的伤害)的概率较低。然而,所有五起死亡事件均与枪支有关。与员工受伤概率较低相关的其他因素包括:与仅被抢劫过一次的商店相比,在被多次抢劫的商店发生抢劫;被盗金额为1至999美元,与未被盗钱物相比;以及抢劫发生时商店中有顾客在场。单员工商店(0.106)和多员工商店(0.111)的员工受伤风险没有显著差异。同样,单员工商店(0.029)和多员工商店(0.022)的员工重伤风险也没有显著差异。我们得出结论,便利店抢劫案中存在几个导致员工受伤的潜在风险因素,其中一些因素适合进行干预。表明需要对这些因素及其与员工受伤的关系进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验