Vucetic N, de Bri E, Svensson O
Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Apr;68(2):116-20. doi: 10.3109/17453679709003991.
In a prospective study of 160 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for lumbar disc herniation, we investigated the value of clinical history for diagnosing the degree of herniation-the main prognostic factor for the postoperative outcome. At surgery, the patients were classified into two groups: intact anulus (negative exploration or protruding disc) and ruptured anulus (subligamentary perforation or complete perforation). The strongest variables predicting the degree of herniation were duration of leg pain, progressive leg pain, educational level and whether or not the patient had previously undergone non-spinal surgery. In patients with ruptured anulus, the median durations of low back pain and sciatica were 16 and 10 weeks, respectively. The corresponding figures for the group with intact anulus were 79 and 50 weeks. 18% of those with ruptured anulus and 39% of those with intact anulus were undergoing medical or psychiatric treatment for other diagnoses; 32% and 55% had previously undergone non-spinal surgery. Thus the two groups differed not only in disc pathology but also in medical, behavioral and social factors that must be taken into account in the preoperative assessment and that may explain discrepancies between impairment and disability.
在一项对160例连续接受腰椎间盘突出症初次手术患者的前瞻性研究中,我们调查了临床病史对于诊断突出程度(术后结果的主要预后因素)的价值。手术时,患者被分为两组:纤维环完整组(探查阴性或椎间盘膨出)和纤维环破裂组(韧带下穿孔或完全穿孔)。预测突出程度的最强变量是腿痛持续时间、进行性腿痛、教育程度以及患者此前是否接受过非脊柱手术。在纤维环破裂的患者中,腰痛和坐骨神经痛的中位持续时间分别为16周和10周。纤维环完整组的相应数字分别为79周和50周。纤维环破裂组中有18%、纤维环完整组中有39%因其他诊断正在接受药物或精神治疗;两组中分别有32%和55%此前接受过非脊柱手术。因此,这两组不仅在椎间盘病理方面存在差异,在医学、行为和社会因素方面也存在差异,这些因素在术前评估中必须予以考虑,并且可能解释损伤与残疾之间的差异。