Van de Weerd H A, Van Loo P L, Van Zutphen L F, Koolhaas J M, Baumans V
Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Lab Anim. 1997 Apr;31(2):133-43. doi: 10.1258/002367797780600152.
Behavioural and psychological needs of laboratory animals generally cannot adequately be met in standard laboratory cages. Environmental enrichment, which provides a more structured environment can enhance the well-being of laboratory animals. They may perform more of their species-specific behaviour and may control their environment in a better way. An easily applicable form of enrichment for laboratory mice is nesting material. Six different types of nesting materials were evaluated in a preference test with male and female animals of two strains [C57BL/6J or BALB/c, n = 48]. No significant differences in preference were found between the strains or between the sexes. All mice showed a clear preference for cages with tissues or towels as compared to paper strips or no nesting material, and for cages with cotton string or wood-wool as compared to wood shavings or no nesting material. Paper-derived materials were preferred over wood-derived materials, although the results also suggest that the nature (paper or wood) of the nesting material is less important than its structure, which determines the nestability of the material. Nesting material may be a relatively simple method to contribute to the well-being of laboratory mice.
标准实验室笼子通常无法充分满足实验动物的行为和心理需求。环境富集提供了一个更具结构性的环境,可以提高实验动物的福祉。它们可能会更多地表现出其物种特定行为,并且能够更好地控制自身环境。对实验小鼠而言,一种易于应用的富集形式是筑巢材料。在一项偏好测试中,对两个品系[C57BL/6J或BALB/c,n = 48]的雄性和雌性动物评估了六种不同类型的筑巢材料。在品系之间或性别之间未发现偏好上的显著差异。与纸条或无筑巢材料相比,所有小鼠都明显更喜欢有纸巾或毛巾的笼子;与刨花或无筑巢材料相比,它们更喜欢有棉线或刨花的笼子。纸质材料比木质材料更受青睐,不过结果也表明,筑巢材料的性质(纸或木)不如其结构重要,而结构决定了材料的可筑巢性。筑巢材料可能是一种相对简单的有助于提高实验小鼠福祉的方法。