• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I类和II类复合树脂修复体的4年回顾性临床研究。

A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations.

作者信息

Geurtsen W, Schoeler U

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):229-32. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00027-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00027-9
PMID:9175350
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the longevity and quality of Class I and Class II resin composite (Herculite XR) restorations placed in private practice.

METHODS

One thousand two hundred and nine Class I and Class II composite restorations with margins in enamel were evaluated clinically after periods of between 12 months and 4.5 years in clinical service by two calibrated examiners using a modified version of established criteria.

RESULTS

Of the restorations investigated 94.8% were rated as 'good' (Alpha 79.3%) or 'clinically acceptable' (Bravo 15.5%). Significantly more restorations in premolar teeth were rated as Alpha (82%) than in permanent molar teeth (77%). The survival rate after 4 years was around 87%. The 50% survival-time, calculated by extrapolation according to Weibull, was approximately 9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that the composite investigated is an appropriate material for the restoration of Class I and Class II lesions with margins located in enamel in premolar and permanent molar teeth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在私人诊所中放置的I类和II类树脂复合材料(Herculite XR)修复体的使用寿命和质量。

方法

由两名经过校准的检查人员,使用既定标准的修改版本,对1209个边缘位于牙釉质的I类和II类复合修复体进行临床评估,这些修复体在临床使用12个月至4.5年后进行评估。

结果

在所调查的修复体中,94.8%被评为“良好”(α级79.3%)或“临床可接受”(β级15.5%)。前磨牙的修复体被评为α级(82%)的比例明显高于恒牙磨牙(77%)。4年后的生存率约为87%。根据威布尔分布通过外推法计算的50%生存时间约为9年。

结论

得出的结论是,所研究的复合材料是修复前磨牙和恒牙磨牙中边缘位于牙釉质的I类和II类病变的合适材料。

相似文献

1
A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations.I类和II类复合树脂修复体的4年回顾性临床研究。
J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):229-32. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00027-9.
2
[A retrospective in vivo study of Sonicsys approx restorations].[关于Sonicsys近似修复体的回顾性体内研究]
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2001;111(2):152-8.
3
A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.后牙复合树脂修复体的临床评估:17年随访结果
J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
4
Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.直接树脂复合材料嵌体/高嵌体:11年随访
J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00010-5.
5
A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.传统设计的中小尺寸Ⅱ类洞型中汞合金与树脂复合体修复体的边缘及内部适应性比较。
Quintessence Int. 2000 May;31(5):347-52.
6
Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.直接光激活复合树脂修复后牙的质量和存活率:一项 5 至 20 年的回顾性纵向研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo.一项关于体内放置的II类树脂复合材料修复体邻面边缘的放射影像学和扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Dent. 1998 May;26(4):319-27. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00024-9.
8
Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years.一种可填充性树脂复合材料 3 年后在后牙中的临床性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Sep;5(3):148-55. doi: 10.1007/s007840100117.
9
A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.对三种树脂复合材料用于Ⅱ类洞修复进行的27年随机对照随访研究。
J Dent. 2015 Dec;43(12):1547-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.对英国普通诊所中放置的混合复合树脂修复体进行的一年期回顾性临床评估。
Quintessence Int. 2001 Apr;32(4):293-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Cavity Lining on the 3-Year Clinical Outcome of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.窝洞衬层对后牙复合树脂修复体3年临床疗效的影响:一项随机对照临床试验
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 7;12(5):128. doi: 10.3390/dj12050128.
2
Evaluation of the Degree of Conversion, Residual Monomers and Mechanical Properties of Some Light-Cured Dental Resin Composites.某些光固化牙科树脂复合材料的转化率、残留单体及力学性能评估
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 30;12(13):2109. doi: 10.3390/ma12132109.
3
Four-year outcomes of restored posterior tooth surfaces-a massive data analysis.
修复后牙面的四年效果——一项海量数据分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2819-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2084-4. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Effects of pulp capping materials on fracture resistance of Class II composite restorations.盖髓材料对Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体抗折性能的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):218-223. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156831.
5
Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial.采用两种不同方法粘结的间接复合树脂修复体:一项十年随访临床试验
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 1;7(1):e54-9. doi: 10.4317/jced.51604. eCollection 2015 Feb.
6
Solubility of two resin composites in different mouthrinses.两种树脂复合材料在不同漱口液中的溶解度。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:580675. doi: 10.1155/2014/580675. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
7
Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study.一种新型牙本质替代物 Biodentine 在修复后牙中的性能和安全性的临床评估 - 一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.后牙复合树脂QuiXfil用于I类和II类洞的随机对照临床试验三年结果
Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Sep;13(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0233-5. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
9
Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite.纳米填料与细颗粒混合树脂复合材料的两年临床性能
Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Jun;10(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0041-8. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
10
Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance.前牙Z250树脂复合材料修复体:临床性能的一年评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Dec;7(4):241-3. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0231-6. Epub 2003 Sep 18.