• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙本质深度对牙本质-复合树脂粘结界面断裂韧性的影响。

Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces.

作者信息

Tam L E, Yim D

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00031-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00031-0
PMID:9175366
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The fracture toughness test was recently introduced as a clinically relevant method for assessing the fracture resistance of the dentine-composite interface. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dentine depth on the interfacial fracture toughness test of several dentine-composite interfaces using some new proprietary dentine bonding agents.

METHODS

Miniature short rod fracture toughness specimens containing a chevron-shaped dentine-composite-bonded interface were prepared for each group (n = 12). Six different dentine bonding agents and two dentine depths were the variables assessed at the dentine-composite interfaces. After 24 h at 37 degrees C in water, the specimens were tested by loading at 0.5 mm/min in the Instron Universal Testing Machine. The interfacial KIC results were analysed by ANOVA, unpaired Student's t-tests and Fisher's LSD test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The interfacial KIC results in MN.m-3/2 (S.D.) on superficial and deep dentine, respectively, were: All-Bond 2, 0.80 (0.21), 0.44 (0.13); Bond-lt, 0.75 (0.20), 0.38 (0.19); Prime and Bond, 0.56 (0.11), 0.28 (0.10); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 0.45 (0.23), 0.26 (0.15); One-Step and OptiBond, insufficient results due to premature specimen failures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study should contribute to the development of the fracture toughness test as a method for assessing the integrity of the dentine-composite interface. The interfacial fracture toughness test determined significant differences among the different dentine bonding agents and between the superficial and deep dentine substrates. The dentine bonding agents showed significantly reduced interfacial fracture toughness results when bonding to deep versus superficial dentine.

摘要

目的

断裂韧性测试最近被引入作为评估牙本质 - 复合材料界面抗断裂性的一种临床相关方法。本研究的目的是使用一些新型专利牙本质粘结剂,评估牙本质深度对几种牙本质 - 复合材料界面的界面断裂韧性测试的影响。

方法

为每组制备了包含人字形牙本质 - 复合材料粘结界面的微型短棒断裂韧性试样(n = 12)。六种不同的牙本质粘结剂和两种牙本质深度是在牙本质 - 复合材料界面评估的变量。在37℃水中放置24小时后,在英斯特朗万能材料试验机上以0.5mm/分钟的加载速度对试样进行测试。通过方差分析、非配对学生t检验和Fisher最小显著差异检验(P < 0.05)分析界面KIC结果。

结果

在浅表和深层牙本质上,界面KIC结果(单位为MN.m-3/2,括号内为标准差)分别为:全粘结2号,0.80(0.21),0.44(0.13);粘结它,0.75(0.20),0.38(0.19);初拌粘结剂,0.56(0.11),0.28(0.10);3M多功能粘结剂,0.45(0.23),0.26(0.15);一步法和优化粘结剂,由于试样过早失效,结果不足。

结论

本研究结果应有助于断裂韧性测试作为一种评估牙本质 - 复合材料界面完整性的方法的发展。界面断裂韧性测试确定了不同牙本质粘结剂之间以及浅表和深层牙本质基质之间的显著差异。当粘结到深层牙本质与浅表牙本质时,牙本质粘结剂显示出显著降低的界面断裂韧性结果。

相似文献

1
Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces.牙本质深度对牙本质-复合树脂粘结界面断裂韧性的影响。
J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00031-0.
2
Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.牙本质/树脂复合材料粘结界面的断裂韧性
J Dent Res. 1993 May;72(5):953-9. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720051801.
3
Fracture resistance of dentin-composite interfaces using different adhesive resin layers.使用不同粘结树脂层时牙本质-复合材料界面的抗折性
J Dent. 2001 Mar;29(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00004-5.
4
Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths.修复性和粘结性固化方法对牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):137-40.
5
Bond failure at dentin-composite interfaces with 'single-bottle' adhesives.使用“单瓶装”粘合剂时牙本质-复合材料界面处的粘结失败。
J Dent. 2003 Feb;31(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00007-1.
6
Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?通用粘结剂与牙本质的粘结——新瓶装旧酒?
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.两种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种树脂基粘结剂的釉质与牙本质剪切粘结强度
J Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;26(5-6):497-503. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00010-4.
8
Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation.十种当代粘合剂对树脂-牙本质粘结降解的抵抗力。
J Dent. 2008 Feb;36(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.002.
9
Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.黏结-牙本质界面的断裂韧性与微拉伸结合强度测试。
Dent Mater. 2013 Jun;29(6):635-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
10
Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface.牙本质表面处理对牙本质-复合树脂粘结界面断裂韧性和拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Res. 1994 Sep;73(9):1530-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730090801.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Giomer in Comparison with Two Dentin Adhesive Systems.与两种牙本质粘结系统相比,聚酸改性复合树脂(Giomer)剪切粘结强度的评估
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Jun;44(6):885-6.