• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙本质/树脂复合材料粘结界面的断裂韧性

Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.

作者信息

Tam L E, Pilliar R M

机构信息

Centre for Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1993 May;72(5):953-9. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720051801.

DOI:10.1177/00220345930720051801
PMID:8501294
Abstract

The reliability and validity of tensile and shear bond strength determinations of dentin-bonded interfaces have been questioned. The fracture toughness value (KIC) reflects the ability of a material to resist crack initiation and unstable propagation. When applied to an adhesive interface, it should account for both interfacial bond strength and inherent defects at or near the interface, and should therefore be more appropriate for characterization of interface fracture resistance. This study introduced a fracture toughness test for the assessment of dentin/resin-composite bonded interfaces. The miniature short-rod specimen geometry was used for fracture toughness testing. Each specimen contained a tooth slice, sectioned from a bovine incisor, to form the bonded interface. The fracture toughness of an enamel-bonded interface was assessed in addition to the dentin-bonded interfaces. Tensile bond strength specimens were also prepared from the dentin surfaces of the cut bovine incisors. A minimum of ten specimens was fabricated for each group of materials tested. After the specimens were aged for 24 h in distilled water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were loaded to failure in an Instron universal testing machine. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the dental adhesives tested. Generally, both the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength measurements were highest for AllBond 2, intermediate for 3M MultiPurpose, and lowest for Scotchbond 2. Scanning electron microscopy of the fractured specimen halves confirmed that crack propagation occurred along the bond interface during the fracture toughness test. It was therefore concluded that the mini-short-rod fracture toughness test provided a valid method for characterization of the fracture resistance of the dentin-resin composite interface.

摘要

牙本质粘结界面拉伸和剪切粘结强度测定的可靠性和有效性一直受到质疑。断裂韧性值(KIC)反映了材料抵抗裂纹萌生和不稳定扩展的能力。当应用于粘结界面时,它应同时考虑界面粘结强度和界面处或其附近的固有缺陷,因此更适合用于表征界面抗断裂性能。本研究引入了一种断裂韧性测试方法来评估牙本质/树脂复合材料粘结界面。采用微型短棒试样几何形状进行断裂韧性测试。每个试样包含一片从牛切牙切下的牙片,以形成粘结界面。除了牙本质粘结界面外,还评估了釉质粘结界面的断裂韧性。还从切割后的牛切牙的牙本质表面制备了拉伸粘结强度试样。对每组测试材料至少制备十个试样。将试样在37℃的蒸馏水中老化24小时后,在Instron万能试验机上加载直至破坏。所测试的牙科粘结剂之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。一般来说,AllBond 2的断裂韧性和拉伸粘结强度测量值最高,3M多功能粘结剂居中,Scotchbond 2最低。对断裂试样的两半进行扫描电子显微镜观察证实,在断裂韧性测试过程中裂纹沿粘结界面扩展。因此得出结论,微型短棒断裂韧性测试为表征牙本质-树脂复合材料界面的抗断裂性能提供了一种有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.牙本质/树脂复合材料粘结界面的断裂韧性
J Dent Res. 1993 May;72(5):953-9. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720051801.
2
Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.传统或光固化玻璃离子体/牙本质界面的断裂韧性。
Oper Dent. 1995 Jul-Aug;20(4):144-50.
3
Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces.牙本质深度对牙本质-复合树脂粘结界面断裂韧性的影响。
J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00031-0.
4
Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface.牙本质表面处理对牙本质-复合树脂粘结界面断裂韧性和拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Res. 1994 Sep;73(9):1530-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730090801.
5
Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.黏结-牙本质界面的断裂韧性与微拉伸结合强度测试。
Dent Mater. 2013 Jun;29(6):635-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Fracture surface characterization of dentin-bonded interfacial fracture toughness specimens.牙本质粘结界面断裂韧性试样的断口表征
J Dent Res. 1994 Mar;73(3):607-19. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730030601.
7
Mini-interfacial fracture toughness as a new validated enamel-bonding effectiveness test.微界面断裂韧性作为一种新的经过验证的牙釉质粘结有效性测试方法。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:446-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Dentin Bonding Testing Using a Mini-interfacial Fracture Toughness Approach.使用微型界面断裂韧性方法进行牙本质粘结测试。
J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;95(3):327-33. doi: 10.1177/0022034515618960. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
Fracture resistance of dentin-composite interfaces using different adhesive resin layers.使用不同粘结树脂层时牙本质-复合材料界面的抗折性
J Dent. 2001 Mar;29(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00004-5.
10
Bond failure at dentin-composite interfaces with 'single-bottle' adhesives.使用“单瓶装”粘合剂时牙本质-复合材料界面处的粘结失败。
J Dent. 2003 Feb;31(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00007-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Elucidating interfacial failure of cervical restorations using damage mechanics: A finite element analysis.使用损伤力学阐明颈部修复体的界面失效:有限元分析。
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):410-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.05.033. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Simulating the Intraoral Aging of Dental Bonding Agents: A Narrative Review.模拟牙科粘结剂的口腔内老化:一项叙述性综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jan 15;10(1):13. doi: 10.3390/dj10010013.
3
Antimicrobial antidegradative dental adhesive preserves restoration-tooth bond.抗菌抗降解牙科胶粘剂可保持修复体与牙齿的粘结。
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1666-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs.不同预备设计的瓷贴面的折裂定位
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 May 25;7(10):1675-1679. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.323. eCollection 2019 May 31.
5
Biostable, antidegradative and antimicrobial restorative systems based on host-biomaterials and microbial interactions.基于宿主生物材料和微生物相互作用的生物稳定、抗降解和抗菌修复系统。
Dent Mater. 2019 Jan;35(1):36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
6
On the Mechanics of Fatigue and Fracture in Teeth.论牙齿疲劳与骨折的力学原理
Appl Mech Rev. 2014 May;66(3):0308031-3080319. doi: 10.1115/1.4027431. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Tensile strength of bilayered ceramics and corresponding glass veneers.双层陶瓷及其相应的玻璃贴面的拉伸强度。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Jun;6(3):151-6. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.151. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
8
An inset CT specimen for evaluating fracture in small samples of material.评估小块材料骨折的嵌体 CT 标本。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Feb;30:358-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
9
Interfacial toughness of bilayer dental ceramics based on a short-bar, chevron-notch test.基于短棒、人字形切口试验的双层牙科陶瓷的界面韧性。
Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
10
Apparent interfacial fracture toughness of resin/ceramic systems.树脂/陶瓷体系的表观界面断裂韧性。
J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1037-41. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501112.