• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The portal pressure response to beta-blockade is greater in cirrhotic patients without varices than in those with varices.

作者信息

Escorsell A, Ferayorni L, Bosch J, García-Pagán J C, García-Tsao G, Grace N D, Rodés J, Groszmann R J

机构信息

Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun;112(6):2012-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178694.

DOI:10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178694
PMID:9178694
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonselective beta-blockers are effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. However, this beneficial effect is highly variable and may depend on the extent of portal system collateralization. The aim of this study was to compare portal pressure response with timolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, in cirrhotic patients with and without varices.

METHODS

Portal and systemic hemodynamics were measured before and after a single oral dose of 10 mg of timolol in 50 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, 15 with and 35 without esophageal varices.

RESULTS

Timolol significantly decreased portal pressure in all patients (mean reduction, 20% +/- 13%; P < 0.0001). The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was greater in patients without varices (-24% +/- 14%) than in those with varices (-12% +/- 8%) (P < 0.01). A decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg was achieved in 7 of 12 (58%) patients without varices and a baseline pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg, but only in 3 of 15 patients with varices (20%) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Timolol is effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients, more so in patients without varices, suggesting that nonselective beta-blockers will be more effective in the treatment of portal hypertension when administered at early stages, before the development of varices.

摘要

相似文献

1
The portal pressure response to beta-blockade is greater in cirrhotic patients without varices than in those with varices.
Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun;112(6):2012-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178694.
2
Preventing the development of varices in cirrhosis.预防肝硬化患者静脉曲张的发生。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov-Dec;41 Suppl 3:S300-4. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318157c63d.
3
Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.β受体阻滞剂预防肝硬化患者的食管胃静脉曲张。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 24;353(21):2254-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044456.
4
Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement in patients with liver cirrhosis: a correlation with disease severity and variceal bleeding.肝硬化患者肝静脉压力梯度测量:与疾病严重程度和静脉曲张出血的相关性
Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45(1):8-13.
5
Randomised clinical study: the effects of oral taurine 6g/day vs placebo on portal hypertension.随机临床研究:口服牛磺酸 6 克/天与安慰剂对门脉高压的影响。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/apt.14377. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
Pharmacologic prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding.药物预防静脉曲张出血和再出血。
Hepatol Int. 2018 Feb;12(Suppl 1):68-80. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9833-y. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Carvedilol, a new nonselective beta-blocker with intrinsic anti- Alpha1-adrenergic activity, has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.卡维地洛是一种新型非选择性β受体阻滞剂,具有内在抗α1肾上腺素能活性,在肝硬化患者中,其门脉降压效果比普萘洛尔更强。
Hepatology. 1999 Jul;30(1):79-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300124.
8
Reduction of variceal pressure by propranolol: comparison of the effects on portal pressure and azygos blood flow in patients with cirrhosis.普萘洛尔降低曲张静脉压力:对肝硬化患者门静脉压力和奇静脉血流影响的比较
Hepatology. 1993 Nov;18(5):1082-9.
9
Calcium channel blockers in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.肝硬化门静脉高压患者中的钙通道阻滞剂
Chin Med J (Engl). 1995 Nov;108(11):803-8.
10
Right atrial pressure is not adequate to calculate portal pressure gradient in cirrhosis: a clinical-hemodynamic correlation study.右心房压力不足以计算肝硬化门静脉压力梯度:临床-血流动力学相关性研究。
Hepatology. 2010 Jun;51(6):2108-16. doi: 10.1002/hep.23612.

引用本文的文献

1
Cirrhotic portal hypertension: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutics.肝硬化门静脉高压症:从病理生理学到新疗法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 28;26(40):6111-6140. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6111.
2
Early primary prophylaxis with beta-blockers does not prevent the growth of small esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial.β受体阻滞剂早期一级预防不能阻止肝硬化患者小食管静脉曲张的进展:一项随机对照试验。
Hepatol Int. 2013 Mar;7(1):248-56. doi: 10.1007/s12072-012-9353-8. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
3
Is it time to replace propranolol with carvedilol for portal hypertension?
是时候将普萘洛尔换成卡维地洛来治疗门静脉高压症了吗?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May 16;7(5):532-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.532.
4
Combined measurements of serum bile acid level and splenic volume may be useful to noninvasively assess portal venous pressure.联合检测血清胆汁酸水平和脾脏体积可能有助于无创评估门静脉压力。
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;47(12):1336-41. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0599-7. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
Quantitative modeling of the physiology of ascites in portal hypertension.门脉高压性腹水生理学的定量建模。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 27;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-26.
6
Variceal bleeding : pharmacological treatment and prophylactic strategies.静脉曲张出血:药物治疗与预防策略
Drugs. 2008;68(16):2303-24. doi: 10.2165/0003495-200868160-00004.
7
Management of portal hypertension.门静脉高压的管理
Postgrad Med J. 2004 Nov;80(949):634-41. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.020446.
8
Monitoring target reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient during pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension: a close look at the evidence.门静脉高压症药物治疗期间监测肝静脉压力梯度的目标降低:审视证据
Gut. 2004 Jan;53(1):143-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.53.1.143.
9
Acute propranolol administration effectively decreases portal pressure in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.急性给予普萘洛尔可有效降低经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)功能障碍患者的门静脉压力。经颈静脉肝内门体分流术。
Gut. 2003 Jan;52(1):130-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.1.130.