Lau H S, de Boer A, Beuning K S, Porsius A
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 May;50(5):619-25. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00040-1.
The validity of drug exposure measurement based on pharmacy records was investigated taking into account completeness of data, drug compliance, and different methods of drug exposure measurement in pharmacy records. Data on prescription drug use were collected from home inventories and community pharmacies in a survey on drug use and compliance in 115 elderly people. To compare drug exposure in pharmacy records with exposure in the home inventory, three different methods for exposure measurement in pharmacy records were used. Two employed a fixed time window of 30 and 90 days, respectively, and the third method was based on the calculated duration of use of a prescription ("legend time"). Drug exposure in the home inventory was taken as the gold standard and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of the different methods were calculated for the most frequently used drugs and drug categories. The specificity and positive predictive value of all three methods was generally high (0.93-1.00 and 0.67-1.00, respectively). The 90-day fixed method and the legend time method generally showed high sensitivity (range: 0.67-1.00 and 0.63-0.83, respectively) for drugs that were used on a chronic basis, while the 30-day fixed method had poor sensitivity (range: 0.29-0.69). Drugs that were used according to the home inventory but not according to the pharmacy records methods could be almost completely retrieved in the pharmacy records of a one-year period showing that these records were virtually complete with regard to prescription drugs. We conclude that computerized pharmacy records can be a reliable source of the true drug exposure as estimated in a home inventory, when adequate attention is paid to the definition of the exposure time-window and when these records are comprehensive with regard to prescription drugs.
基于药房记录的药物暴露测量的有效性进行了调查,同时考虑了数据的完整性、药物依从性以及药房记录中药物暴露测量的不同方法。在一项针对115名老年人的药物使用和依从性调查中,从家庭药品清单和社区药房收集了处方药使用数据。为了比较药房记录中的药物暴露与家庭药品清单中的暴露情况,使用了三种不同的药房记录暴露测量方法。其中两种方法分别采用了30天和90天的固定时间窗口,第三种方法基于计算出的处方药使用时长(“法定时长”)。将家庭药品清单中的药物暴露作为金标准,并针对最常用的药物和药物类别计算了不同方法的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预测值。所有三种方法的特异度和阳性预测值总体上较高(分别为0.93 - 1.00和0.67 - 1.00)。对于长期使用的药物,90天固定方法和法定时长方法通常显示出较高的灵敏度(范围分别为0.67 - 1.00和0.63 - 0.83),而30天固定方法的灵敏度较差(范围为0.29 - 0.69)。根据家庭药品清单使用但未被药房记录方法记录的药物,在一年期的药房记录中几乎可以完全找回,这表明这些记录在处方药方面几乎是完整的。我们得出结论,当充分关注暴露时间窗口的定义且这些记录在处方药方面全面时,计算机化的药房记录可以成为家庭药品清单中估计的真实药物暴露的可靠来源。