Szych J, Kałuzewski S
Zakład Bakteriologii PZH w Warszawie.
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1996;48(3-4):151-68.
In this testing bacteriological laboratories of 49 epidemiological stations were participating. Eleven control tests were prepared in form of lyophilize faecal samples containing three different organisms in each sample with pathogenic organisms present in each of 10 tests (a different species in each test) along with a non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae strain, while the 11th test contained only organisms belonging to physiological intestinal flora. Each laboratory received two different tests for doing them. The following bacterial strains were used S. oranienburg var, lac+ S. muenster, S. infantis, S. sonnei, S. flexneri, A. hydrophila, Y. enterocolitica, E. coli 018, E. coli 026, E. coli 0124, and as accompanying organisms: C. freundii var lac+ and lac-, P. mirabilis and H. alvei. Among 49 participating laboratories 31 (63.3%) detected the etiological infectious agent in both samples, or its absence was shown in the 11th test. In 23 laboratories (46.9%) the cultured organisms were species-grouped or their serological type was established, in the remaining 8 laboratories (16.3%) the identification was incomplete or serological type was not correctly recognized. In 15 laboratories (30.6%) the infectious agent was found in only one test, and in 12 of these laboratories (25.5%) the cultured organism were identified correctly completely, and in 3 (6.1%) identification was incomplete or serological type was not correctly recognized. In 3 (6.1%) among 49 laboratories the infectious agent was not found in any test. The study made possible an insight into the reliability of the diagnostic tests for Enterobacteriaceae carried out in the sanitary-epidemiological stations. The use of faeces-simulating samples made possible to assess not only the correct identification of the isolated organisms, but also to trace the course of the diagnostic management used in each laboratory for testing of faeces samples.
49个流行病学站的细菌学实验室参与了此次检测。制备了11份对照测试样本,形式为冻干粪便样本,每份样本包含三种不同的生物体,其中10份样本中存在致病生物体(每份样本中的致病生物体种类不同),还有一份非致病性肠杆菌科菌株,而第11份样本仅包含属于生理性肠道菌群的生物体。每个实验室收到两份不同的测试样本进行检测。使用了以下细菌菌株:奥兰宁堡沙门氏菌变种、乳糖发酵型明斯特沙门氏菌、婴儿沙门氏菌、宋内氏志贺菌、福氏志贺菌、嗜水气单胞菌、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌、大肠杆菌O18、大肠杆菌O26、大肠杆菌O124,以及作为伴随生物体的:弗氏柠檬酸杆菌乳糖发酵型和非乳糖发酵型、奇异变形杆菌和蜂房哈夫尼亚菌。在49个参与实验室中,31个(63.3%)在两份样本中均检测到病原性感染因子,或者在第11份样本中显示未检测到。在23个实验室(46.9%)中,对培养出的生物体进行了种属分组或确定了其血清型,在其余8个实验室(16.3%)中,鉴定不完整或血清型未被正确识别。在15个实验室(30.6%)中,仅在一份测试样本中发现了感染因子,其中12个实验室(25.5%)对培养出的生物体进行了完全正确的鉴定,3个实验室(6.1%)鉴定不完整或血清型未被正确识别。在49个实验室中有3个(6.1%)在任何测试样本中均未发现感染因子。该研究使得能够深入了解卫生流行病学站对肠杆菌科进行诊断测试的可靠性。使用模拟粪便样本不仅能够评估对分离出的生物体的正确鉴定,还能够追踪每个实验室在检测粪便样本时所采用的诊断流程。