Stein H F
Psychoanal Q. 1977;46(4):650-83.
Jewish ethno-reliqious history is analyzed as one pole of an interdependent Judeo-Christian system of opposition and symbiosis, in which reciprocal dissociation and projective identification function homeostatically to make history recur and to perpetuate what are ostensibly separate traditions. The nature of identification with the Father and with the Son is explored in the two traditions. Anti-Semitism and anti-Gentilism are seen as mirror images, reflecting what is ego-dystonic and ethosdystonic in Christianity and Judaism. It is argued that the Abraham-Isaac relationship is paradigmatic in Judaism and that throughout Jewish history, the Jewish people have accepted both the sacrificial role of Isaac and the punitive role of Abraham, with the paradoxical consequence that martyrdom is the unconscious symbol of survival.
犹太民族宗教历史被分析为一个相互依存的犹太教与基督教对立共生系统的一极，在这个系统中，相互解离和投射性认同以稳态方式发挥作用，使历史重演，并使表面上相互分离的传统得以延续。在这两种传统中探讨了与圣父和圣子认同的本质。反犹主义和反异教主义被视为镜像，反映了基督教和犹太教中与自我和精神气质不相容的部分。有人认为，亚伯拉罕与以撒的关系在犹太教中具有典范性，并且在整个犹太历史中，犹太民族既接受了以撒的牺牲角色，也接受了亚伯拉罕的惩罚角色，其矛盾的结果是殉道成为生存的无意识象征。
