Beit-Hallahmi B
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Israel.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1994;31(3):200-10.
The psychological foundations of Judaism are a major challenge to psychoanalytic theory. This (selective) literature review focuses on post-Freudian work on this question. Freud described Judaism as a father religion, within the Oedipal framework of all religions and cultures. Over the years other notions have become dominant, and we can observe the changes from the Oedipal to the pre-Oedipal and towards more attention to maternal projections. Jewish mythology is a major topic, and the attention given to it bears no relation to its role in living Judaism. Many psychoanalytic contributions which aim at interpreting Judaic mythology demonstrate mostly their authors' inability to separate mythological narratives and history, as they accept without criticism the biblical account of supposedly ancient events, and then continue with speculations about mythological personages and events. The literature we have reviewed is certainly psychoanalytic, but one question is its relationship to Freud's work on religion. What emerges is that in many cases there is no attempt to follow Freud in the sense of accepting his assertions, but there is continuity in terms of interpretive temperament. Freud's writings have served as stimulus and inspiration, not as dogma to be upheld.
犹太教的心理学基础是对精神分析理论的一项重大挑战。这篇(选择性的)文献综述聚焦于后弗洛伊德时代关于这个问题的研究。弗洛伊德在所有宗教和文化的俄狄浦斯框架内,将犹太教描述为一种父系宗教。多年来,其他观念占据了主导地位,我们可以观察到从俄狄浦斯阶段到前俄狄浦斯阶段的转变,以及对母亲投射的更多关注。犹太神话是一个主要话题,对它的关注与其在当代犹太教中的作用并无关联。许多旨在解读犹太神话的精神分析贡献,大多表明其作者无法区分神话叙事和历史,因为他们不加批判地接受了圣经中关于所谓古代事件的记载,然后继续对神话人物和事件进行臆测。我们所综述的文献无疑是精神分析的,但一个问题是它与弗洛伊德关于宗教的著作有何关系。结果发现,在许多情况下,并没有试图在接受弗洛伊德论断的意义上追随他,但在解释风格方面存在连续性。弗洛伊德的著作起到了激励和启发的作用,而非有待坚守的教条。