Machado J C, von Kruger M A, Fontes E M, de Almeida M M
Biomedical Engineering Program, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Physiol Meas. 1997 May;18(2):129-43. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/18/2/004.
Clinical assessment of the blood clotting mechanism is usually made by measuring the time necessary for a sample of plasma to clot. In this work a semi-automatic method for measuring coagulation time is evaluated. It employs ultrasound, at 2.7 MHz, for monitoring variations of the viscosity in a plasma sample undergoing coagulation. The evaluation is performed by comparing measurements obtained by two well-known methods, the manual tilt tube and the fibrometer, with those obtained using the ultrasonic method. A total of 330 plasma samples from individuals with normal and altered homeostatic process were analysed. The experimental protocol follows two standard tests: the prothrombin time (141 samples) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (189 samples). The agreement between the three different methods is estimated statistically and it is shown that all the three can be used interchangeably for clinical purposes.
血液凝固机制的临床评估通常是通过测量血浆样本凝固所需的时间来进行的。在这项工作中,对一种半自动凝血时间测量方法进行了评估。它采用2.7兆赫兹的超声波来监测正在发生凝血的血浆样本中的粘度变化。通过将两种知名方法(手动倾斜管法和纤维蛋白原测定仪法)获得的测量结果与使用超声波方法获得的测量结果进行比较来进行评估。共分析了330份来自体内稳态过程正常和异常个体的血浆样本。实验方案遵循两项标准测试:凝血酶原时间(141个样本)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(189个样本)。对三种不同方法之间的一致性进行了统计学估计,结果表明这三种方法在临床应用中均可互换使用。