• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌家族史与肺癌组织学类型的关联:爱荷华州女性健康研究

Association of family history of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer with histological categories of lung cancer: the Iowa Women's Health Study.

作者信息

Anderson K E, Woo C, Olson J E, Sellers T A, Zheng W, Kushi L H, Folsom A R

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Jun;6(6):401-5.

PMID:9184772
Abstract

A family history of cervical, ovarian, or uterine cancer has been shown to be associated with increased lung cancer risk among postmenopausal women. The present report examines the hypotheses that a family history of cervical cancer is positively associated with histological subtypes of lung cancer most strongly associated with smoking and that a family history of ovarian or uterine cancer are positively associated with risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Data are from the Iowa Women's Health Study, a prospective cohort study of 34,480 women ages 55-69 in 1986. Personal smoking histories, use of alcohol, and family history of selected cancers in first- and second-degree relatives were collected at baseline. Follow-up for cancer occurrence was achieved through the State Health Registry of Iowa. After baseline exclusions, a total of 343 incident lung cancers were identified in the cohort at risk through 1994. Women with a family history of cervical cancer in a first-degree relative had a multivariate-adjusted relative risk of lung cancer of 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-2.6] compared to women without a family history. The risk was particularly high for malignancies most strongly associated with smoking (squamous, small cell, and large cell tumors; relative risk, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7). Consistent with our hypotheses, a family history of ovarian cancer was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk (multivariate adjusted) of adenocarcinoma of the lung; the association with malignancies more strongly associated with smoking was inverse (relative risk, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-2.4). A family history of uterine cancer was not associated with adenocarcinoma, but there was a positive association observed for the most strongly smoking-associated histological types. These results suggest that a family history of cervical cancer is a modest independent risk factor for lung cancers most strongly associated with smoking, and a family history of ovarian cancer is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung.

摘要

宫颈癌、卵巢癌或子宫癌家族史已被证明与绝经后女性患肺癌风险增加有关。本报告检验了以下假设:宫颈癌家族史与与吸烟关系最为密切的肺癌组织学亚型呈正相关,卵巢癌或子宫癌家族史与肺腺癌风险呈正相关。数据来自爱荷华州女性健康研究,这是一项对1986年34480名年龄在55 - 69岁女性进行的前瞻性队列研究。在基线时收集了个人吸烟史、饮酒情况以及一级和二级亲属中特定癌症的家族史。通过爱荷华州州立健康登记处对癌症发生情况进行随访。经过基线排除后,到1994年,在有风险的队列中总共确定了343例新发肺癌病例。与没有家族史的女性相比,一级亲属中有宫颈癌家族史的女性患肺癌的多变量调整相对风险为1.6[95%置信区间(CI):0.98 - 2.6]。与吸烟关系最为密切的恶性肿瘤(鳞状细胞癌(鳞癌)、小细胞癌和大细胞癌;相对风险为2.0;95% CI为1.1 - 3.7)的风险尤其高。与我们的假设一致,卵巢癌家族史与肺腺癌的多变量调整风险增加约2倍相关;与吸烟关系更密切的恶性肿瘤的关联则相反(相对风险为0.6;95% CI为0.2 - 2.4)。子宫癌家族史与肺腺癌无关,但在与吸烟关系最为密切的组织学类型中观察到正相关。这些结果表明,宫颈癌家族史是与吸烟关系最为密切的肺癌的一个适度独立危险因素,卵巢癌家族史是肺腺癌的一个危险因素。

相似文献

1
Association of family history of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer with histological categories of lung cancer: the Iowa Women's Health Study.宫颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌家族史与肺癌组织学类型的关联:爱荷华州女性健康研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Jun;6(6):401-5.
2
Familial clustering of colon, breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers as assessed by family history.通过家族病史评估结肠癌、乳腺癌、子宫癌和卵巢癌的家族聚集性。
Genet Epidemiol. 1993;10(4):235-44. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370100404.
3
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
4
Association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the incidence of lung cancer in the Iowa women's health study.爱荷华州女性健康研究中使用非甾体抗炎药与肺癌发病率之间的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Nov;15(11):2226-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0172.
5
Vegetables, fruit, and lung cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study.爱荷华州女性健康研究中的蔬菜、水果与肺癌
Cancer Res. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):536-43.
6
Anthropometric variables, physical activity, and incidence of ovarian cancer: The Iowa Women's Health Study.人体测量学变量、身体活动与卵巢癌发病率:爱荷华州女性健康研究。
Cancer. 2004 Apr 1;100(7):1515-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20146.
7
Relative and absolute risks of cigarette smoking on major histologic types of lung cancer in Korean men.韩国男性中吸烟对主要组织学类型肺癌的相对风险和绝对风险
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Sep;14(9):2125-30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0236.
8
Does a family history of cancer increase the risk for postmenopausal endometrial carcinoma? A prospective cohort study and a nested case-control family study of older women.癌症家族史会增加绝经后子宫内膜癌的风险吗?一项针对老年女性的前瞻性队列研究和一项巢式病例对照家族研究。
Cancer. 1999 Jun 1;85(11):2444-9.
9
Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer: long-term, subsite-specific risks in a cohort study of postmenopausal women.吸烟与结直肠癌:一项绝经后女性队列研究中的长期、特定亚部位风险
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May;1(3):202-10. doi: 10.1053/cgh.2003.50030.
10
The impact of family history on ovarian cancer risk. The Utah Population Database.家族史对卵巢癌风险的影响。犹他州人口数据库。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 May 8;155(9):905-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer.系统评价与荟萃分析 20 世纪吸烟与肺癌相关的流行病学证据。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 3;12:385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-385.
2
The impact of positive cancer family history on the clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.阳性癌症家族史对非小细胞肺癌患者的临床特征和结局的影响。
Fam Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9403-0.
3
Familial cancer aggregation and the risk of lung cancer.
家族性癌症聚集与肺癌风险
Sao Paulo Med J. 2002 Mar 7;120(2):38-44. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802002000200003.