Mundt C, Backenstrass M, Kronmiller K T, Fiedler P, Kraus A, Stanghellini G
Psychiatric University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Psychopathology. 1997;30(3):130-9. doi: 10.1159/000285039.
The purpose of this study was to objectify some of the personality dimensions of the typus melancholicus (TM) personality formation in endogenous depressives and to compare the consistency of the term used in questionnaires with the original concept as delineated in our preceding paper. The prevalence of TM in endogenous-depressive inpatients was 51% for patients with clearly salient TM features. In addition 25% of the sample showed TM features to a minor extent. These findings are consistent with the literature. MMPI and MPI could not separate TM and non-typus melancholicus (NTM) in univariate analyses. However, the Munich Personality Test (MPT) contributes to validating the TM concept. TM depressives scored significantly higher in MPT subscales rigidity and norm orientation. According to its item structure the MPT rigidity subscore can be considered to conceptually encompass hypernomia, i.e. the patient's incapacity to change the norms that were once adopted. Based on the characteristics of item formulations in the MPT subscore norm orientation it was hypothesized that this subscore corresponds to the concept of heteronomia, i.e. conformism towards externally determined and uncritically followed social norms. Since MPT norm orientation in TM does not covariate with control scales of the other inventories used in this study, it is likely that MPT norm orientation refers to the TM patient's sincere commitment to social norms rather than to a sham reaction in the sense of a lie scale. There was no consistent indication that TM shows lower neuroticism scores than NTM.
本研究的目的是客观化内源性抑郁症患者中抑郁型人格(TM)人格形成的一些人格维度,并比较问卷中使用的术语与我们前文所描述的原始概念的一致性。在内源性抑郁住院患者中,具有明显突出TM特征的患者中TM的患病率为51%。此外,25%的样本在较小程度上表现出TM特征。这些发现与文献一致。在单变量分析中,明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)和慕尼黑人格问卷(MPI)无法区分TM和非抑郁型人格(NTM)。然而,慕尼黑人格测试(MPT)有助于验证TM概念。TM抑郁症患者在MPT分量表“僵化”和“规范取向”上得分显著更高。根据其项目结构,MPT僵化子分数在概念上可以被认为包含过度规范,即患者无法改变曾经采用的规范。基于MPT子分数规范取向中项目表述的特征,有人假设该子分数对应于他律的概念,即对外部确定且不加批判遵循的社会规范的顺从。由于本研究中TM的MPT规范取向与所使用的其他量表的控制量表不相关,MPT规范取向很可能指的是TM患者对社会规范的真诚承诺,而不是说谎量表意义上的虚假反应。没有一致的迹象表明TM的神经质得分低于NTM。