Suppr超能文献

使用霍利保持器和透明覆盖式保持器时咬合接触的比较。

Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers.

作者信息

Sauget E, Covell D A, Boero R P, Lieber W S

机构信息

New Jersey Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Newark 07103, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):223-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0223:COOCWU>2.3.CO;2.

Abstract

Following orthodontic treatment, an increase in the number of occlusal contacts is usually desired during retention. In this study, Hawley and clear overlay orthodontic retainers were compared relative to changes in the number of occlusal contacts. Occlusal contacts were quantified in 30 orthodontic patients at debonding, at retainer delivery, and after 3 months of retention. The paired t-test was applied to evaluate longitudinal changes in the number of and intensity of contacts. Results show that with the Hawley retainer there was a significant increase in occlusal contacts on posterior teeth and no change on anterior teeth. With the clear overlay retainer there was no significant change in either posterior or anterior contacts during retention. The retentive capacities of the two retainers differ: the Hawley retainer allows relative vertical movement (settling) of the posterior teeth while the clear overlay retainer holds teeth in their debanding position.

摘要

正畸治疗后,保持期间通常希望咬合接触数量增加。在本研究中,比较了霍利保持器和透明覆盖式正畸保持器在咬合接触数量变化方面的情况。对30名正畸患者在拆除矫治器时、佩戴保持器时以及保持3个月后进行了咬合接触的量化。采用配对t检验来评估接触数量和强度的纵向变化。结果显示,使用霍利保持器时,后牙的咬合接触显著增加,前牙无变化。使用透明覆盖式保持器时,保持期间后牙或前牙的接触均无显著变化。两种保持器的固位能力不同:霍利保持器允许后牙相对垂直移动(沉降),而透明覆盖式保持器将牙齿保持在拆除矫治器时的位置。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验