Cossmann M, Kohnen C, Langford R, McCartney C
Département de Pharmacovigilance et d'Information, Grünenthal GmbH, Stolberg, Allemagne.
Drugs. 1997;53 Suppl 2:50-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199700532-00010.
This article presents a summary of drug safety data concerning the use of tramadol hydrochloride and an outline of the specific aspects of this analgesic in particular with regard to respiratory depression and dependence potential. Information from phase II to IV clinical studies, postmarketing surveillance studies (covering safety data from a total of more than 21,000 patients) and the spontaneous reporting system have been taken into consideration. The data from the spontaneous reporting system covers the period between 1977 and 1993, during which more than one billion single dose units were distributed throughout the world. The phase II to IV studies compare acute intravenous, acute intramuscular, acute oral and multiple dose oral administration Postmarketing surveillance studies provide a picture of everyday use of tramadol in general medical practice. Further analyses were performed to provide information about the gender-, age- and dose-related distribution of adverse reactions The prevalence of side effects was calculated by comparing the number of symptoms with the number of patients. The pooled data from the clinical studies and the postmarketing surveillance studies reveal that the most commonly observed side effects were nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, tiredness, sweating, vomiting and dry mouth, with an overall incidence of between 1 and 6%. In the postmarketing surveillance studies on long term and acute administration, the profile of adverse events was qualitatively almost identical to that in the phase II to IV studies. However, there were distinct quantitative differences it favour of the long term studies. In the postmarketing surveillance study on acute parenteral administration, the incidences of nausea and vomiting were only 4.2 and 0.5% respectively, which is significantly lower than the 20.7 and 11.4% in the patient-controlled analgesia studies. Nevertheless, it is important to take into consideration the different conditions in these studies. All the postmarketing surveillance studies were outpatient studies, whereas almost all of the phase II to IV studies were carried out in hospitals. The studies with intravenous and intramuscular administration were mainly postoperative, which explains the relatively high incidence of nausea and vomiting, 17.8 and 7.0%, respectively, with intramuscular administration. The different conditions in the phase II to IV studies and the postmarketing surveillance studies are also reflected in the occurrence of dizziness and postural hypotension: The incidence of dizziness in the postmarketing surveillance studies is slightly higher than that observed in the phase II to IV studies. Particularly in the studies with intravenous and intramuscular administration, the patients were confined to bed and were therefore much less sensitive to dizziness than those in the long term oral and postmarketing surveillance studies, who were all outpatients. On the other hand, postural hypotension played almost no role in the multiple dose studies, in which the oral formulation were used most frequently. It is interesting to note that diarrhoea, pruritus and gastrointestinal disorder (except nausea and vomiting) are mainly reported in the multiple dose studies in the groups receiving oral tramadol, and also in the postmarketing surveillance studies. Once again, the study conditions may well be the explanation. The adverse effects reported in both clinical and postmarketing surveillance studies are similar to those in the spontaneous reports. The most frequently documented adverse effects in clinical and postmarketing surveillance studies, i.e. nausea/vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, tiredness, sweating and dry mouth, are noted very infrequently in spontaneous reports, since in medical practice these side effects are usually known and are described in the product information. Almost all reports referring to abuse/dependence are connected with pain therapy; they give no reason to suspect any pro
本文介绍了有关盐酸曲马多使用的药物安全性数据总结,以及这种镇痛药在呼吸抑制和潜在依赖性等特定方面的概述。已考虑了来自II期至IV期临床研究、上市后监测研究(涵盖总共超过21000名患者的安全数据)和自发报告系统的信息。自发报告系统的数据涵盖了1977年至1993年期间,在此期间全球分发了超过10亿单剂量单位。II期至IV期研究比较了急性静脉注射、急性肌肉注射、急性口服和多剂量口服给药情况。上市后监测研究提供了曲马多在一般医疗实践中日常使用情况的描述。进行了进一步分析以提供有关不良反应的性别、年龄和剂量相关分布的信息。通过将症状数量与患者数量进行比较来计算副作用的发生率。临床研究和上市后监测研究的汇总数据显示,最常观察到的副作用是恶心、头晕、嗜睡、疲倦、出汗、呕吐和口干,总体发生率在1%至6%之间。在长期和急性给药的上市后监测研究中,不良事件的情况在质量上与II期至IV期研究几乎相同。然而,在数量上存在明显差异,长期研究的数据更有优势。在急性胃肠外给药的上市后监测研究中,恶心和呕吐的发生率分别仅为4.2%和0.5%,明显低于患者自控镇痛研究中的20.7%和11.4%。然而,考虑到这些研究中的不同情况很重要。所有上市后监测研究都是门诊研究,而几乎所有II期至IV期研究都是在医院进行的。静脉注射和肌肉注射给药的研究主要是术后研究,这解释了肌肉注射给药时恶心和呕吐的发生率相对较高,分别为17.8%和7.0%。II期至IV期研究和上市后监测研究中的不同情况也反映在头晕和体位性低血压的发生上:上市后监测研究中头晕的发生率略高于II期至IV期研究中观察到的发生率。特别是在静脉注射和肌肉注射给药的研究中,患者卧床,因此对头晕的敏感性远低于长期口服和上市后监测研究中的患者,后者都是门诊患者。另一方面,体位性低血压在多剂量研究中几乎不起作用,在这些研究中最常使用口服制剂。有趣的是,腹泻、瘙痒和胃肠道疾病(恶心和呕吐除外)主要在接受口服曲马多的多剂量研究组以及上市后监测研究中报告。同样,研究条件很可能是原因。临床研究和上市后监测研究中报告的不良反应与自发报告中的相似。临床研究和上市后监测研究中最常记录的不良反应,即恶心/呕吐、头晕、嗜睡、疲倦、出汗和口干,在自发报告中很少被提及,因为在医疗实践中这些副作用通常是已知的,并在产品信息中有所描述。几乎所有提及滥用/依赖的报告都与疼痛治疗有关;它们没有理由怀疑任何……