• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格五因素模型与单相、双相和精神分裂症患者之间的关系。

Relationship between the five-factor model of personality and unipolar, bipolar and schizophrenic patients.

作者信息

Bagby R M, Bindseil K D, Schuller D R, Rector N A, Young L T, Cooke R G, Seeman M V, McCay E A, Joffe R T

机构信息

Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 1997 May 5;70(2):83-94. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)03096-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0165-1781(97)03096-5
PMID:9194202
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine personality differences among three different Axis I disorders-recovered patients with unipolar depression (n = 62), euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (n = 34), and patients with schizophrenia in the residual phase of their illness (n = 41) using the five-factor model of personality (FFM). The dimensions of the FFM-Neuroticism (N), Extraversion (E), Openness (O), Agreeableness (A), and Conscientiousness (C)-were measured with composite scores derived from the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). While no group differences emerged on N or C, the bipolar patients scored significantly higher on the Positive Emotion facet (subscale) of E than the unipolar patients. The schizophrenic patients scored lower on the Feelings, Values and Actions facets of O than did the unipolar and bipolar patients. The unipolar patients scored higher on A than the schizophrenic patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用五因素人格模型(FFM),考察三种不同的轴I障碍康复患者之间的人格差异:单相抑郁症康复患者(n = 62)、双相情感障碍心境正常患者(n = 34)以及疾病残留期的精神分裂症患者(n = 41)。通过从《大五人格问卷》(NEO PI)和《修订版大五人格问卷》(NEO PI-R)得出的综合分数,对FFM的维度——神经质(N)、外向性(E)、开放性(O)、宜人性(A)和尽责性(C)——进行测量。虽然在N或C上未出现组间差异,但双相情感障碍患者在E的积极情绪子量表上的得分显著高于单相抑郁症患者。精神分裂症患者在O的情感、价值观和行为子量表上的得分低于单相抑郁症患者和双相情感障碍患者。单相抑郁症患者在A上的得分高于精神分裂症患者。

相似文献

1
Relationship between the five-factor model of personality and unipolar, bipolar and schizophrenic patients.人格五因素模型与单相、双相和精神分裂症患者之间的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 1997 May 5;70(2):83-94. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)03096-5.
2
Bipolar disorder, unipolar depression and the Five-Factor Model of personality.双相情感障碍、单相抑郁症与人格五因素模型
J Affect Disord. 1996 Nov 4;41(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00060-2.
3
[Intolerance of ambiguity in affective and schizophrenic disorders].[情感障碍和精神分裂症中的模糊耐受性]
Nervenarzt. 1991 May;62(5):269-73.
4
[Tolerance of ambiguity in endogenous psychoses from the transcultural viewpoint].
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1996 Sep;64(9):358-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996578.
5
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Anomalous subjective experiences in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unipolar depression.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和单相抑郁症中的异常主观体验。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;54(5):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
7
A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.匈牙利情感气质的一项研究:TEMPS-A相对于TCI和NEO-PI-R的内部一致性和同时效度。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
8
[Personality traits in patients with unipolar and bipolar disorder].[单相和双相情感障碍患者的人格特质]
Psychiatr Pol. 2003 Mar-Apr;37(2):225-33.
9
Object relations and reality testing in schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and healthy controls: differences in profiles and clinical correlates.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和健康对照组的客体关系和现实检验:特征和临床相关性的差异。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;53(8):1200-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 11.
10
Phenomenology of first-episode psychosis in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unipolar depression: a comparative analysis.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和单相抑郁症首发精神病的现象学:一项比较分析。
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2012 Oct;6(3):145-51. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.6.3.6.

引用本文的文献

1
Five-factor personality traits in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者的五因素人格特质:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Sep 1;28(9). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf060.
2
Predicting clinical outcomes in a blended care intervention for early psychosis: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily-Life (ACT-DL).预测早期精神病混合护理干预的临床结果:日常生活中的接纳与承诺疗法(ACT-DL)。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03214-1.
3
Obesity has limited behavioural overlap with addiction and psychiatric phenotypes.
肥胖与成瘾和精神表型的行为重叠有限。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):27-35. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0752-x. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Personality and the Expression of Symptomatology in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.人格与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中症状学的表现
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019 Nov;207(11):899-907. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001060.
5
Normative and Maladaptive Personality Trait Models of Mood, Psychotic, and Substance Use Disorders.情绪、精神病性及物质使用障碍的规范性与适应不良性人格特质模型。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2018;40(4):606-613. doi: 10.1007/s10862-018-9688-0. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
Identification of genetic loci shared between schizophrenia and the Big Five personality traits.鉴定精神分裂症和大五人格特质之间共享的遗传基因座。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 22;7(1):2222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02346-3.
7
Dissection of major depressive disorder using polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in two independent cohorts.在两个独立队列中使用精神分裂症的多基因风险评分剖析重度抑郁症。
Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;6(11):e938. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.207.
8
Factor analysis of temperament and personality traits in bipolar patients: Correlates with comorbidity and disorder severity.双相情感障碍患者气质和人格特质的因素分析:与共病及疾病严重程度的相关性
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
9
Personality traits in established schizophrenia: aspects of usability and differences between patients and controls using the Swedish universities Scales of Personality.已确诊精神分裂症患者的人格特质:使用瑞典大学人格量表评估的可用性方面及患者与对照组之间的差异
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;70(6):462-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2016.1159331. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Personality diatheses and Hurricane Sandy: effects on post-disaster depression.人格素质与桑迪飓风:对灾后抑郁的影响。
Psychol Med. 2016 Mar;46(4):865-75. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002378. Epub 2015 Dec 1.