Geyer S
Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jun;44(12):1771-9. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00286-9.
Aaron Antonovsky's sense of coherence (SOC) [(1987) Unraveling the Mystery of Health, How People Manage Stress and Stay Well, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco] ought to explain why some people manage stress and stay well while others break down. According to Antonovsky's formulation, SOC is strongly developed if a person sees the world as comprehensible (i.e. rational, understandable, consistent and predictable), as manageable, and as meaningful (i.e. challenging and that things are worth making commitments for). Sense of coherence has gained widespread attention and has been used as an explanatory variable in many studies. This paper discusses some aspects that have not sufficiently been considered in the SOC literature. First, an outline of the construct is given. Next, overlaps and differences with other concepts in the same domain are discussed. Little empirical evidence concerning the stability of SOC is available. Therefore, findings from experimental social psychological studies on self-esteem are applied to SOC. Third, it can be assumed that SOC is an attitude of people who are well educated, are in rather privileged societal positions, and with opportunities for decision-making. Finally, the empirical basis is reviewed. Statistical relationships between SOC and symptoms/disease are in the predicted direction, but due to the simultaneous assessment of variables it is open to debate whether a low SOC has some effect on the probability of falling ill or whether it is the other way around. Very high negative correlations between SOC and depression/anxiety suggest that the instruments used may assess the same phenomenon, but with inverse signs. Based on these considerations, directions for further research are proposed.
亚伦·安东诺夫斯基的连贯感(SOC)[(1987年)《解开健康之谜:人们如何应对压力并保持健康》, Jossey - Bass出版社,旧金山]理应能解释为什么有些人能够应对压力并保持健康,而另一些人却会崩溃。根据安东诺夫斯基的表述,如果一个人认为世界是可理解的(即合理、可理解、一致且可预测的)、可掌控的以及有意义的(即具有挑战性且事情值得为之做出承诺),那么连贯感就会得到强烈发展。连贯感已受到广泛关注,并在许多研究中被用作解释变量。本文讨论了连贯感文献中尚未得到充分考虑的一些方面。首先,给出了该概念的概述。其次,讨论了与同一领域其他概念的重叠和差异。关于连贯感稳定性的实证证据很少。因此,将实验社会心理学中关于自尊的研究结果应用于连贯感。第三,可以假设连贯感是受过良好教育、处于相当优越社会地位且有决策机会的人的一种态度。最后,回顾了实证基础。连贯感与症状/疾病之间的统计关系符合预测方向,但由于变量是同时评估的,所以低连贯感是否对患病概率有影响,或者情况是否相反,仍有待讨论。连贯感与抑郁/焦虑之间非常高的负相关表明所使用的工具可能评估的是同一现象,但符号相反。基于这些考虑,提出了进一步研究的方向。